The Role of Expert Witnesses in Building Safety Disputes - An Urgent Rethink? The Role of Expert Witnesses in Building Safety Disputes - An Urgent Rethink?

The Role of Expert Witnesses in Building Safety Disputes - An Urgent Rethink?

In this article, Rose Wilson and Mariya Rankin from Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP, and Bhavina Vasishta from Rimkus consider whether...
The mandatory duty on range of opinion The mandatory duty on range of opinion

The mandatory duty on range of opinion

The Claimant was suing in relation to profound disabilities he suffered due to the Defendant’s admitted clinical negligence. While some of the experts...
Categorisation of injuries for sentencing purposes Categorisation of injuries for sentencing purposes

Categorisation of injuries for sentencing purposes

Many medical experts from a variety of specialties, but in particular accident and emergency, may be called upon to advise the court as to the nature,...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Amr Danyall Marshal & Ors v Awais Javed & Ors [2025] EWHC 3195 (Ch)
Case Updates

Amr Danyall Marshal & Ors v Awais Javed & Ors [2025] EWHC 3195 (Ch)

The judge found that the report by the claimants’ forensic accounting expert was not expert evidence because it simply reported what the underlying documents said in a more digestible way, without adding any expert opinion. On the one or two occasions where the expert did offer an opinion, they were not opinions on any accountancy matter.