Login Join Us
A court cannot ignore an unchallenged expert report A court cannot ignore an unchallenged expert report

A court cannot ignore an unchallenged expert report

The High Court found that the Crown Court was bound to accept an uncontested expert report if it did not have a valid reasons for departing from the...
Expert Witness Survey - Equal Representation Expert Witness Survey - Equal Representation

Expert Witness Survey - Equal Representation

Take 5 minutes to help monitor progress
Appeal in the Cause Michael Marshall against Berkshire Hathaway International Insurance... Appeal in the Cause Michael Marshall against Berkshire Hathaway International Insurance...

Appeal in the Cause Michael Marshall against Berkshire Hathaway International Insurance...

The sheriff appeal court upheld the sheriff's award of damages for injuries sustained in a vehicle accident which were assessed, in the...
A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and... A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

EWI Honorary Fellow Tony Saggers has been a drug trafficking Expert Witness since 1995, alongside a career in law enforcement that spanned 30 years....
Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

The Forensic Science Regulator is consulting on the draft for the development of version 2 of the forensic science code of practice.

News

R v Nijhawan [2022] EWCA Crim 10
Priya Vaidya
/ Categories: Case Updates

R v Nijhawan [2022] EWCA Crim 10

The appeal: The applicant was convicted of the manslaughter of his wife on the grounds of diminished responsibility and sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 10 years. The application was for leave to appeal against sentence and to call fresh evidence from Professor David Healy to the effect that the medication for depression which the applicant was taking was capable of inducing suicidal and homicidal tendencies in people who would not otherwise be at risk of committing homicide or suicide and that there appeared to be a strong case that this medication compromised the applicant's functioning, causing or contributing to the killing of his wife.

 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Previous Article The modern expert: personal insights and current issues - Lord Hamblen of Kersey addresses expert witnesses at EWI's annual Conference
Next Article An issue for the court to determine, not a planning consultant.
Print
499
Comments are only visible to subscribers.