Login Join Us
Frasers Group plc v Saxo Bank AS & Anor [2024] EWHC 188 (Comm) Frasers Group plc v Saxo Bank AS & Anor [2024] EWHC 188 (Comm)

Frasers Group plc v Saxo Bank AS & Anor [2024] EWHC 188 (Comm)

The judge considered, but did not reach a conclusion on, whether a party's communications with their expert before a joint meeting of...
O v O [2023] EWFC 161 O v O [2023] EWFC 161

O v O [2023] EWFC 161

A Single Joint Expert caused difficulties by an unwise pre-hearing exchange with one of the parties in the absence of the other party, and...
A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal

A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal

We’re starting a new EWI series with A spotlight on… the Post Office Horizon Scandal which looks at how the Post Office failed to listen...
Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation

Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee is consulting on proposed changes to the Civil Procedure Rules to ensure that courts consider alterative...
A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and... A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

EWI Honorary Fellow Tony Saggers has been a drug trafficking Expert Witness since 1995, alongside a career in law enforcement that spanned 30 years....
Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

The Forensic Science Regulator is consulting on the draft for the development of version 2 of the forensic science code of practice.

News

An issue for the court to determine, not a planning consultant.
Simon Berney-Edwards

An issue for the court to determine, not a planning consultant.

A recent case in Northern Ireland’s High Court has seen lawyers criticised for the inclusion of non-compliant evidence. At the heart of this was an expert witness who stated that the planning permission for a GAA stadium in Casement Park, Belfast, was “unlawful”.

 

Mr Justice Michael Humphreys made the remarks after rejecting several grounds of challenge. He noted that this was an issue which was “demonstrably for the court to determine, not a planning consultant”. This language demonstrated a “complete lack of understanding of the role of an expert witness in our legal system”.

 

The court commented: “Solicitors and counsel owe obligations to the court to ensure the proper administration of justice and affidavits of this nature should never have been filed.”

 

Simon Berney-Edwards, EWI Chief Executive Officer, said “This is another timely reminder that the Expert’s role is to provide their expert opinion based on the facts. They are not permitted to usurp the role of the court in deciding disputed facts and ultimate issues.”

Previous Article R v Nijhawan [2022] EWCA Crim 10
Next Article S (Vulnerable Party: Fairness of Proceedings) [2022] EWCA Civ 8
Print
2340
Comments are only visible to subscribers.