DHV (A Protected Party through his Litigation Friend WTX) v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2025]... DHV (A Protected Party through his Litigation Friend WTX) v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2025]...

DHV (A Protected Party through his Litigation Friend WTX) v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2025]...

The Claimant brought a claim for compensiation in the UK after he was hit by an uninsured driver while on holiday in Mallorca and suffered major...
Loose talk, snide remarks and the expertise of general practitioners Loose talk, snide remarks and the expertise of general practitioners

Loose talk, snide remarks and the expertise of general practitioners

This is an important case for three reasons. First, it found that a general practitioner, giving evidence about the depressive disorder diagnosed...
Ms Julia Tosh v Mr Vivek Gupta [2025] EWHC 2025 (KB) Ms Julia Tosh v Mr Vivek Gupta [2025] EWHC 2025 (KB)

Ms Julia Tosh v Mr Vivek Gupta [2025] EWHC 2025 (KB)

The Claimant brought a claim of clinical negligence after suffering a rare but serious complication (anal stenosis) of an operation performed by the...
Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness... Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

In the 15th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Membership Manager, Will Watkis, discuss the power of EWI membership and the...
How should Experts disclose criticisms when they are frequently unaware of the outcome of... How should Experts disclose criticisms when they are frequently unaware of the outcome of...

How should Experts disclose criticisms when they are frequently unaware of the outcome of...

The judgement from The Honourable Mr Justice Trower asserts that Expert Witnesses have a duty to disclose previous criticisms of their evidence in...
Access to Justice Inquiry Access to Justice Inquiry

Access to Justice Inquiry

The House of Commons, Justice Committee has published a Call for Evidence for its Inquiry on Access to Justice. The Inquiry will examine how advice...
A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

Marisa Shek is a Healthcare Architect and owner of Shek Architects. As an Expert Witness, she specialises in the field of accommodation for disabled...
The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025 The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

The Criminal Procedure Rule Committee has published a new consolidation of the Criminal Procedure Rules and an accompanying guide. The new Rules will...
Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025 Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

In the 14th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Marketing and Events Manger, Heather George, reflect on their highlights from...
A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

Susan Jones, founder of SJ Consultancy, has been a town planning consultant for over 40 years. As an Expert Witness, she provides evidence at public...
Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

In the 13th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at five long-standing policy issues that have had significant developments recently: (1)...
A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

Dr. Rohit Seth is trained in Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hair Transplant Surgery with over 20 years of surgical experience. A practicing...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Most unsatisfactory expert paediatric evidence
Keith Rix 826

Most unsatisfactory expert paediatric evidence

byKeith Rix

 

Commentary

For paediatricians this is an example of how not to conduct an expert paediatric assessment and present the results to the court. It also illustrates some basic points applicable to all experts.

Learning points:

General
  • An expert report should address all the issues in their instructions.

  • If an expert is unable to assist as to an issue, the instructing party should be informed as soon as possible, the reasons should be stated and, if the expert is able to do so, advice given as to who might be instructed or the appropriate professional discipline.

  • Unwillingness to make any concessions and defensiveness in cross-examination can call into question an expert’s independence.

  • An opinion on a matter not in issue and, especially with a slim evidential basis, risks judicial criticism.

  • Experts should be curious and able to apply forensic scrutiny to evidence that may not be understood sufficiently, or at all, by the court without their assistance.

  • If potentially significant evidence in medical records is disregarded, the expert should explain why.

Paediatric cases
  • Paediatricians acting as expert witnesses in family cases should be familiar with the RCPCH Perplexing Presentations (PP)/Fabricated or Induced Illness (FII) in children – guidance (https://childprotection.rcpch.ac.uk/resources/perplexing-presentations-and-fii/ ), able to recognise them, able to assess risk and know what the managements are for the different types of presentation so as to assist the court as fully as possible.

  • In a case where an issue is the allegations that the parents make against each other, what is required of the expert is a careful, chronological, objective and neutral analysis of a parent's interactions with the medical professionals in the child's life. It is necessary to compare and contrast what, for example, the parent had reported with that which had been observed by the professionals. It is necessary to attempt to identify patterns or habits and to consider the challenge that may have been made by the parent to the views of the professionals (and, indeed, which on the evidence may have been made). A detailed analysis is required.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.