When can you challenge an Expert Determination? When can you challenge an Expert Determination?

When can you challenge an Expert Determination?

The outcome of an Expert Determination is final and binding. However, there are circumstances in which the outcome can be appealed. The case of GSY...
Working with Expert Witnesses in Aviation Working with Expert Witnesses in Aviation

Working with Expert Witnesses in Aviation

Working with expert witnesses... is a new monthly article series. The series takes a look at the role of expert witnesses in a range of sectors from...
New EWI guidance on Marketing your Expert Witness Practice New EWI guidance on Marketing your Expert Witness Practice

New EWI guidance on Marketing your Expert Witness Practice

Whether you are just starting out as an Expert Witness or an experienced Expert Witness looking to increase the number of instructions you are...
Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice

Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice

In April's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a deep dive into Marketing your Expert Witness Practice, providing practical advice on...
Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge. Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge.

Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge.

Experts on Premex's panel have contacted the EWI to say that they will be subject to a15% service charge (plus VAT) on all invoices from 1 May...
A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness

We speak to Lynn Hannon, a learning disability and autism specialist nurse who works as an Expert Witness on quantum care assessments, loss of service...
Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in Northern Ireland; a tale of two experts Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in Northern Ireland; a tale of two experts

Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in Northern Ireland; a tale of two experts

Although the detail of McIntyre, R v [2026] NICC 2 will probably be of importance only for forensic science imagery analysts, it is important for...
DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2) DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2)

DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2)

This case, in the Court of Protection, concerned whether a wealthy, elderly man lacked capacity. The judgment dealt primarily with an application by...
Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

In March's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss some recent examples of experts in the courts, drawing out the key learning points...
Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

In February's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at feedback and criticism. We go over the rules, discuss the key recent case...
A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

Dr Jane Duff is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Head of the National Spinal Injuries Centre Psychology Service, and an Expert Witness. Here, she...
A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

Veterinary surgeon, Jeremy Stattersfield, has been guiding courts on veterinary medicine since 1981. He told us how he got into the Expert Witness...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Sir Michael Davies Lecture 2025: Lady Simler, Enhancing Expert Evidence: Reports, Opinions, and Judicial Perspectives.
Sean Mosby 1222

Sir Michael Davies Lecture 2025: Lady Simler, Enhancing Expert Evidence: Reports, Opinions, and Judicial Perspectives.

bySean Mosby

Lady Simler presenting the Sir Michael Davies Lecture

The Annual Sir Michael Davies Lecture for 2025 was held on 15 October at the RAF Club in London. The Right Honourable Lady Simler, Justice of the Supreme Court, delivered an insightful lecture on Enhancing Expert Evidence: Reports, Opinions, and Judicial Perspectives, which was summed up perfectly by EWI Chair Sir Martin Spencer as the blueprint for providing the best written and oral expert evidence.

Intoduction

Lady Simler set the scene for her lecture by noting the importance of the highest quality standards and impartiality of expert witnesses in the context of increasing scientific sophistication, growing public awareness of forensic limitations, and evolving legal standards. Bodies such as the EWI are critical to ensuring Expert Witnesses give the best evidence they can as interpreters of their expert disciplines and act as a bridge between the laboratory and the courtroom.

A fundamental challenge Experts face is serving two masters: satisfying the rigour of their expert discipline while, at the same time, communicating effectively with legal professionals and a lay audience. The Expert must have the ability to think like a scientist while speaking like an educator.

 

Enhancing written reports

Lady Simler discussed practical ways Expert can enhance their written reports.

  1. The structure of a written report is critically important.

    • Reports should be well structured with a logical format that is easy to navigate, including numbered paragraphs, headings and sub-headings.

    • Your summary should answer the fundamental questions.

    • Your methodology section should give an account of the decisions you made and the reasons why.

  2. Clarity should be at the forefront of your mind.

    • Use cautious, precise language.

    • Use short sentences and the active rather than the passive voice.

    • Avoid the use of jargon, explain technical terms, and use those terms consistently.

    • Think about how you might use visual information.

  3. Confidence in your report is essential.

    • Acknowledge the limitations of your role and your conclusions.

    • Explain the uncertainties that surround your conclusions and make it clear when you can’t reach a definite conclusion.

 

Enhancing oral evidence

Lady Simler then turned to advice about giving oral evidence.

  1. Your goal in oral evidence is to ensure the lay audience understands your conclusions and the reliability of the process that led to them.

  2. Preparation and technique can make all the difference.

    • Good preparation should make you ready to explain how you have reached every conclusion you have reached.

    • Ensure that you’ve understood any analysis you’ve relied on, and any key assumptions on which it depends.

  3.  Try to anticipate areas of challenge and how you might explain your answer.

  4. Depending on the case, it might help to create a comprehensive case file including your technical analysis, relevant scientific literature, validation studies and clear explanations of any novel techniques you have used.

  5. Be prepared to discuss peer review status of your methods and any ongoing scientific debates that are relevant to your conclusions. 

  6. Critically, if you need to change your opinion its far better to be upfront rather than remain silent in hope it isn’t spotted by the other side or raised in cross-examination.

  7. If possible, attend at least part of the trial before giving your evidence.

 

Strategies for surviving cross-examination

Cross-examination is designed to test both your technical knowledge and your confidence and reliability, looking to damage or remove some of the internal building blocks that support your opinion.

  1. Think through those internal building blocks in your report as part of your preparation.

  2. Use the other side’s expert report to test your assumptions and analysis.

  3. Nervousness is understandable but can lead to mistakes:

    • Speak slowly and clearly, judge the pace of your delivery by ensuring that the judge’s pen is keeping up with you.

    • Pause before answering questions.

    • Don’t guess – ask for clarification if you don’t fully understand the question and never be afraid to say that you don’t know the answer.

    • Listen to the question you have been asked and answer only that question, not the question you wished you had been asked.  

    • Keep your answers short and direct.

    • Don’t be defensive.

  4. Your answers to cross-examination should be structured, logical, well-reasoned, while remaining neutral and objective.

    • If asked a binary question, answer yes/no with a but, if you need to qualify your answer.

    • Giving evidence if not a memory test. You are entitled to refer back to your report.

    • Don’t be afraid to say you don’t know.

    • Politely decline if asked to speculate about something beyond your expertise.

    • Recognise that you are not the advocate. Your overriding duty to the court should be the fundamental principle that guides every aspect of your role.

 

Continuing professional development

Lady Simler concluded by discussing how improving your written and oral evidence also depends on strengthening your role as an independent Expert in whom the legal system can place confidence.

  1. Stay up-to-date with developments in your field, maintain active involvement in professional organisations, such as the EWI, attend confernces, etc. 

  2. Leverage scientific advances while ensuring their appopriate application and keep informed of the scientific and academic debates which surround these new technologies. 

  3. Develop data management systems to ensure the integrity and accessiblity of that material.

  4. Your continuing clinical and practical experience can also be very significant. 

  5. Actively seek feedback on your written reports and your evidence from the legal professionals with whom you work. 

  6. Think about joining continuing legal education programmes. 

  7. Consider opportunities to mentor a more junior Expert Witness. 

We highly recommend watching Lady Simler’s full lecture and the Q&A session that follows. The video is available in the EWI webshop at: https://www.ewi.org.uk/Web-Shop#!prod/7347ceef-a6ad-f011-bbd3-7ced8d6ca5a8/curr/GBP

We would like to thank Lady Simler for her insightful lecture, MAPS Medical for sponsoring the lecture, and all the members and non-members who joined us for an insightful and enjoyable evening.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.