Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge. Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge.

Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge.

Experts on Premex's panel have contacted the EWI to say that they will be subject to a15% service charge (plus VAT) on all invoices from 1 May...
A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness

We speak to Lynn Hannon, a learning disability and autism specialist nurse who works as an Expert Witness on quantum care assessments, loss of service...
Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in Northern Ireland; a tale of two experts Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in Northern Ireland; a tale of two experts

Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in Northern Ireland; a tale of two experts

Although the detail of McIntyre, R v [2026] NICC 2 will probably be of importance only for forensic science imagery analysts, it is important for...
Fortythree Tech Named EWI Platinum Sponsor for Key 2026 Events Fortythree Tech Named EWI Platinum Sponsor for Key 2026 Events

Fortythree Tech Named EWI Platinum Sponsor for Key 2026 Events

DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2) DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2)

DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2)

This case, in the Court of Protection, concerned whether a wealthy, elderly man lacked capacity. The judgment dealt primarily with an application by...
Expert evidence in a vacuum of facts and startling use of Smart Glasses by the claimant Expert evidence in a vacuum of facts and startling use of Smart Glasses by the claimant

Expert evidence in a vacuum of facts and startling use of Smart Glasses by the claimant

In straying from their original instructions, the expert developed an opinion without all the facts of the case and the second claimant was being...
UPDATE: New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of... UPDATE: New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of...

UPDATE: New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of...

The guidance sets out the text that you should use in your declarations for work undertaken in England and Wales for the English and Welsh Criminal...
Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

In March's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss some recent examples of experts in the courts, drawing out the key learning points...
Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

In February's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at feedback and criticism. We go over the rules, discuss the key recent case...
A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

Dr Jane Duff is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Head of the National Spinal Injuries Centre Psychology Service, and an Expert Witness. Here, she...
A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

Veterinary surgeon, Jeremy Stattersfield, has been guiding courts on veterinary medicine since 1981. He told us how he got into the Expert Witness...
Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

In January's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss responding to written questions. We look at the rules and regulations, discuss a...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge.
Simon Berney-Edwards 25

Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge.

bySimon Berney-Edwards

 

We have become aware that last Friday, Premex emailed their panel of medical experts announcing the introduction of a 15% service charge (plus VAT) on all invoices which are presented to them from the 1st May 2026. The charge will be deducted from payments made to experts rather than invoiced separately.

Premex have cited the recent judgment in JXX v Archibald [2026] EWHC 630 (SCCO), handed down by Senior Costs Judge Rowley on 17 March, as the trigger. In that case the judge capped the recoverable Medical Reporting Organisation mark-up at 25% of the expert’s invoice - though he was clear that a higher mark-up isn’t necessarily unreasonable, just that only 25% is recoverable inter partes. Premex’s position is that operating at a 25% cap makes their business unviable, and they are therefore recouping the shortfall from experts instead.

From the feedback we have had from members so far, it is unclear whether this relates to all experts (we are aware some have not received an email despite it saying it has been sent to all) or fixed fee cases opposed to hourly rates (there has been a suggestion that it might not cover fixed fees).

Premex cite as justification for the charge include marketing for new work, arranging appointments, obtaining and storing medical records, electronic instructions, data protection and ISO 27001/GDPR compliance, quality control of reports, fit and proper person checks, database maintenance, cyber security, clinical governance, early payment of invoices, credit control, and absorbing the risk of non-payment by law firms including cases where fees are written off due to client non-compliance or failed cases.

However, this would have been the work that they should have been doing previously for the costs they were charging. In addition, it is not clear whether they will still be applying the mark-up as well as applying the service charge. But we suspect this is the case, meaning that they are passing the consequences of an adverse ruling directly onto experts.

This presents a serious impact for those who do work through Premex, especially as they seem to be applying this to work which is nearing completion but not invoiced or instructions that have been accepted but not completed.

If you do work for Premex, we would recommend that you:

  • Make sure you have received the email and if not, query why you have not received it.
  • Review your Terms and Conditions and consider taking contractual advice as to whether the timescale they have given for the application of this service charge (especially for work all ready agreed to) meets the terms of your contract. If not, you should communicate this to Premex and seek agreement for this to be applies within the correct circumstances.
  • Consider whether you need to take advice over any VAT considerations especially if they will be deducting their fee, plus VAT from the total sum of your fee plus VAT.
  • Assess the consequences of this change on your expert witness practice and income and consider your options for which we have lots of advice in the Knowledge Hub, including our new Marketing Guide which has gone live today.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.