17 September 2024 Keith Rix 1537 Case Updates Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal byKeith Rix Commentary This case is primarily of interest to obstetricians, illustrating the court’s approach to the disputed interpretation of cardiotocographic evidence. There were no midwifery issues as such, but it may be of some interest to midwifery experts. The general learning points speak for themselves without reading the summary. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags ObstetricsMidwifery16. Criticism and Complaints11. Report Writing15. Giving Oral Evidence Related articles Muhammad Suleman against One Insurance Ltd [2025] SC GLA 88 To list or not to list, that is the question Graham Harry Moore v Sarah Joanne Pochin MP & Anor [2025] EWHC 3012 (KB) Not a fundamentally dishonest stroke victim Alison Marie Tarrant v Simon Monkhouse [2025] EWHC 2576 (KB) Switch article Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees Previous Article The Single Biggest Change White Paper Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.