Experts who rise above the fray and fully discharge their duties to assist the Court Experts who rise above the fray and fully discharge their duties to assist the Court

Experts who rise above the fray and fully discharge their duties to assist the Court

The case concerned around 40 studio recordings of performances which were given by the members of the Jimi Hendrix Experience. The expert witnesses in...
Praise for experts gives insight into what makes oral evidence credible Praise for experts gives insight into what makes oral evidence credible

Praise for experts gives insight into what makes oral evidence credible

Despite attacks on the expert’s credibility, the judge provided praise for all three experts in the case of Gillian Dakin v South Tees...
Car-Wizard Limited v Vixen Surface Treatments Limited [2026] EWHC 685 (Ch) Car-Wizard Limited v Vixen Surface Treatments Limited [2026] EWHC 685 (Ch)

Car-Wizard Limited v Vixen Surface Treatments Limited [2026] EWHC 685 (Ch)

The claimant asserted misrepresentation and breach of a collateral contract by the defendant in respect of the supply of a vertical diamond cutting...
Unregulated Experts in Family Court Children Proceedings Unregulated Experts in Family Court Children Proceedings

Unregulated Experts in Family Court Children Proceedings

From March to June 2025, the Family Procedure Rule Committee held a consultation on new Family Procedure Rule 25.5A concerning the instruction of...
Working with Expert Witnesses in Clinical Negligence Claims: Practical Considerations and... Working with Expert Witnesses in Clinical Negligence Claims: Practical Considerations and...

Working with Expert Witnesses in Clinical Negligence Claims: Practical Considerations and...

In the fourth article in the Working with expert witnesses series, Michael Kingman from Setfords Solicitors, discusses his experience of...
A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness

We speak to David Deacon, a chartered surveyor who has spent his career in residential property. He founded Housing Disrepair Surveys, leading a team...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Aspirin and haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome
Keith Rix 1408

Aspirin and haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome

byKeith Rix

 

Commentary

This is an important judgment for obstetricians as it shows in precise detail how the court, relying on not just the experts’ evidence but a critical analysis of the literature on which they relied, decided whether the claimant would have avoided developing HELLP had she been advised to take 75 mg aspirin at 12 (or 14) weeks instead of at 23. Twelve publications were put under the microscope and considered also in the light of research concerning the relative value of aggregate data and individual participant data.

Although the issue in this case was the prevention of HELLP, it may be an important judgment to consider in pre-eclampsia cases.

Learning points:

General

  • It is important to investigate the full history of symptoms

  • It can be misleading to quote only investigation results that support an opinion and not to quote results that undermine the opinion.

  • An inability to explain why some results have been quoted and others ignored can call an expert’s credibility into question.

  • Where an expert’s opinion is inconsistent with the observations and conclusions of a range of healthcare professionals, and without a convincing explanation, this can affect the expert’s credibility and the weight given to their opinion.

  • More than symptoms are needed to make a diagnosis.

  • Where an expert is passionate about their opinion, this may be evidence of their sincerity but combined with being unwilling to recognise and balance countervailing evidence and unwillingness save in very limited respects to make any concessions, and show the ‘flexibility of mind’ referred to in Loveday v Renton, along with, in this case, proneness to making sweeping statements, their objectivity may be in question.

  • When criticising the methodology of a study upon which another expert relies, consider whether the same point could be made about other studies, including those upon which you rely.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.