Take care not to conflate your role as a contractor with your duties as an expert witness Take care not to conflate your role as a contractor with your duties as an expert witness

Take care not to conflate your role as a contractor with your duties as an expert witness

The parties disagreed on the extent of the repairs required to the joists, and the manner in which the repairs should be effected, following the...
Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness

This month, on the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at the issues and challenges of being an expert advisor versus an expert witness, and...
Disclosure and redaction of medical and safeguarding records Disclosure and redaction of medical and safeguarding records

Disclosure and redaction of medical and safeguarding records

We have previously considered the problem for experts of redacted medical records. This, and the actual disclosure of medical, and also safeguarding,...
Help us map those working in the UK as Expert Witnesses Help us map those working in the UK as Expert Witnesses

Help us map those working in the UK as Expert Witnesses

Have your say in this important research and be in with a chance of winning £200 in vouchers of your choice.
Gary Alexander MacDougall v Lloyd Philip Thomas & Ors [2026] EWHC 1142 (Ch) Gary Alexander MacDougall v Lloyd Philip Thomas & Ors [2026] EWHC 1142 (Ch)

Gary Alexander MacDougall v Lloyd Philip Thomas & Ors [2026] EWHC 1142 (Ch)

The case focussed on the validity of a will and codicil made by a wealthy lady, Mrs MacDougall, as well as a number of substantial gifts and...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Unregulated Experts in Family Court Children Proceedings
Sean Mosby 479

Unregulated Experts in Family Court Children Proceedings

bySean Mosby

 

From March to June 2025, the Family Procedure Rule Committee held a consultation on new Family Procedure Rule 25.5A concerning the instruction of unregulated experts. The consultation also proposed amendments to FPR 25.2 and Practice Directions ('PDs') 25B and 25C.  The aim of new FPR 25.5A is to require any expert instructed in family law children proceedings to be regulated. A key purpose of the changes is to ensure that any expert instructed in family law children proceedings has the appropriate skills and qualifications on which to base their expert evidence. 

In the minutes of its April meeting (fprc-mins-13-april-2026.pdf), the Committee indicated that changes to the FPR on unregulated experts in children proceedings will be included in the next statutory instrument, expected in July, alongside the corresponding practice direction changes. The key change from the consultation drafting related to consideration of how forensic experts should be reflected in the changes. The Committee decided that, rather than attempting to make the rule apply to forensic experts, they would be exempted and a new definition of ‘technical expert’ be introduced to provide for this.

The Committee also indicated that they will be re-looking at whether to extend the rule change to financial remedy proceedings, with proposals for next steps being considered at their May meeting.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.