Login Join Us
A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal

A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal

We’re starting a new EWI series with A spotlight on… the Post Office Horizon Scandal which looks at how the Post Office failed to listen...
Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB) Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB)

Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB)

The case involved the question of whether the claimants should have permission to call expert security evidence.
Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation

Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee is consulting on proposed changes to the Civil Procedure Rules to ensure that courts consider alterative...
Expert evidence and an absent defendant Expert evidence and an absent defendant

Expert evidence and an absent defendant

A defendant who chose not to attend or be represented at trial, suggested that he might still instruct his expert witness to provide oral...
A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and... A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

EWI Honorary Fellow Tony Saggers has been a drug trafficking Expert Witness since 1995, alongside a career in law enforcement that spanned 30 years....
Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

The Forensic Science Regulator is consulting on the draft for the development of version 2 of the forensic science code of practice.

News

Radia v Marks [2022] EWHC 145 (QB)

Radia v Marks [2022] EWHC 145 (QB)

Background: Between June 2006 and March 2017 the claimant worked for a global investment banking firm, Jefferies Ltd ("Jefferies") as a research analyst in the equity market. On 19 November 2009, he was diagnosed with acute myeloid leukaemia ("AML") In May 2015 he commenced proceedings in the Employment Tribunal alleging disability discrimination against Jefferies, the disability in question being AML. His claim was comprehensively dismissed. The Tribunal found that in a number of respects the claimant had not told the truth and that he had intentionally misled the Tribunal. A contested detailed costs assessment followed and those costs were the subject of this claim.

 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

 

Previous Article Palmer v Mantas [2022] EWHC 90 (QB)
Next Article R v AAD [2022] EWCA Crim 106
Print
1286
Comments are only visible to subscribers.