16 October 2023 Wiebke Morgan 1447 Case Updates OXR v Mid and South Essex Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2023] EWHC 2006 (KB) byWiebke Morgan The judge did not find either expert compelling overall. Each had changed their initial view on significant issues without offering cogent reasons for doing so. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to judgement Share Print Tags NegligenceMedical expertENT surgery14. Changing your opinion13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements Related articles Andrew Cannestra v Mclaren Automotive Events Limited [2025] EWHC 1844 (KB) Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025 Email chains, gross misconduct and the experts who count the cost Expert suggests Google would probably give the court a better answer than him Philipa Hodgson v Dr Daniel Hammond & Anor [2025] EWHC 1261 (KB) Switch article Astley (A minor) v Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2023] EWHC 1921 (KB) Previous Article Jennings v Otis Ltd [2023] EWHC 2039 (KB) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.