16 October 2023 Wiebke Morgan 1106 Case Updates OXR v Mid and South Essex Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2023] EWHC 2006 (KB) byWiebke Morgan The judge did not find either expert compelling overall. Each had changed their initial view on significant issues without offering cogent reasons for doing so. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to judgement Share Print Tags NegligenceMedical expertENT surgery14. Changing your opinion13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements Related articles Rajan Marwaha v Director of Border Revenue & Anor Revenue & Anor Legal teams need to observe Expert’s fatigue & concentration Advising as to the applicable law EWI publishes new Guidance on Expert Discussions and Joint Statements Nothing short of a demolition of the expert's evidence Switch article Astley (A minor) v Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2023] EWHC 1921 (KB) Previous Article Jennings v Otis Ltd [2023] EWHC 2039 (KB) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.