Login Join Us
A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal

A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal

We’re starting a new EWI series with A spotlight on… the Post Office Horizon Scandal which looks at how the Post Office failed to listen...
Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB) Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB)

Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB)

The case involved the question of whether the claimants should have permission to call expert security evidence.
Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation

Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee is consulting on proposed changes to the Civil Procedure Rules to ensure that courts consider alterative...
Expert evidence and an absent defendant Expert evidence and an absent defendant

Expert evidence and an absent defendant

A defendant who chose not to attend or be represented at trial, suggested that he might still instruct his expert witness to provide oral...
A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and... A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

EWI Honorary Fellow Tony Saggers has been a drug trafficking Expert Witness since 1995, alongside a career in law enforcement that spanned 30 years....
Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

The Forensic Science Regulator is consulting on the draft for the development of version 2 of the forensic science code of practice.

News

Mathieu v Hinds [2022] EWHC 924 (QB)
Priya Vaidya
/ Categories: Case Updates

Mathieu v Hinds [2022] EWHC 924 (QB)

The case: a claim for damages for personal injuries arising out of a serious road traffic accident in which the Claimant sustained a serious brain injury. The experts agreed that the Claimant had made a very good recovery from his injuries. One of the key issues was whether the Claimant should be awarded provisional damages in relation to the chance of developing dementia due to his brain injury.

 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Previous Article Commscope Technologies LLC v SOLiD Technologies, Inc [2022] EWHC 769 (Pat)
Next Article M (A Child : Private Law Children Proceedings: Case Management: Intimate Images) [2022] EWHC 986 (Fam)
Print
695
Comments are only visible to subscribers.