The recoverability and assessment of Medical Reporting Organisation Fees The recoverability and assessment of Medical Reporting Organisation Fees

The recoverability and assessment of Medical Reporting Organisation Fees

Judgement handed down provides greater clarity for Expert Witness Agencies/Panels. JXX (a Protected Party by his Litigation Friend ABB) v Scott...
Financial Remedies Guide 2026 Financial Remedies Guide 2026

Financial Remedies Guide 2026

The Financial Remdies Court ('FRC') has published the Financial Remedies Guide 2026. The Guide, which took effect on 13 March 2026, brings...
Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

In March's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss some recent examples of experts in the courts, drawing out the key learning points...
What were the effects of repeated sexual abuse at the hands of a schoolteacher? What were the effects of repeated sexual abuse at the hands of a schoolteacher?

What were the effects of repeated sexual abuse at the hands of a schoolteacher?

This case illustrates a number of difficulties for the adult victims of childhood sexual abuse. Diagnoses of psychiatric disorder in childhood have to...
An expert report that is almost worse than useless An expert report that is almost worse than useless

An expert report that is almost worse than useless

The claimant was involved in a minor road traffic accident while she was the passenger in a car driven by her partner, who was the defendant’s...
When experts are the subject of regulatory complaints When experts are the subject of regulatory complaints

When experts are the subject of regulatory complaints

Most professionals who act as expert witnesses are potentially subject to fitness to practice or other types of regulatory or professional body...
If you're wearing two hats, make sure you comply with the rules If you're wearing two hats, make sure you comply with the rules

If you're wearing two hats, make sure you comply with the rules

The expert acting for the appellant had appeared before the Valuation Tribunal for England as advocate and expert for the appellant, and he continued...
Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

In February's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at feedback and criticism. We go over the rules, discuss the key recent case...
A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

Dr Jane Duff is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Head of the National Spinal Injuries Centre Psychology Service, and an Expert Witness. Here, she...
A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

Veterinary surgeon, Jeremy Stattersfield, has been guiding courts on veterinary medicine since 1981. He told us how he got into the Expert Witness...
Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

In January's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss responding to written questions. We look at the rules and regulations, discuss a...
A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

Mr Niall Craig is a Consultant Orthopaedic Spinal Surgeon and Expert Witness specialising in complex spinal cases. He tells us about his professional...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Irish High Court introduces two new practice directions designed to streamline clinical negligence proceedings
Wiebke Morgan 2560

Irish High Court introduces two new practice directions designed to streamline clinical negligence proceedings

byWiebke Morgan

These come into effect on 28th April 2025

Practice direction HC132 provides for the establishment of a dedicated Clinical Negligence List within the Dublin Personal Injuries List of the High Court. This is intended to ensure clinical negligence matters receive focussed attention by experienced judges and that they benefit from enhanced case management.

This list will be managed by a High Court judge and will apply to all stages of clinical negligence proceedings.

The judge in charge can:

  • set timetables for the exchange of expert reports;
  • make directions for mediation;
  • make orders relating to witness statements or expert evidence; and
  • issue any other directions necessary to ensure fair and prompt resolution of proceedings.

New procedure for applying for a trial date

Practice direction HC131 introduces a new procedure for applying for a trial date in clinical negligence proceedings. The aim of the new procedure is to ensure cases are properly pleaded before a trial date is assigned and to facilitate the earlier resolution of clinical negligence actions. This should in turn decrease legal costs.

Under the new procedure, a party seeking to apply for a trial date must give the other parties 28 days’ notice of their intention to do so and must also complete a Certificate of Compliance for the Court. The requirement to complete such a certificate is a new requirement.

In the Certificate of Compliance, the party applying for a trial date must certify that:

  • they have fully pleaded all aspects of their case;
  • they have exchanged a complete schedule of all witnesses, factual and expert (or have offered to do so);
  • they have exchanged all expert reports intended to be relied upon at trial (or offered to do so); and
  • they undertake to offer mediation within 3 weeks of the date on which the trial date is fixed and to engage in mediation within 6 weeks of the offer being accepted. This requirement to offer mediation in this framework is new and we expect that this will lead to the earlier resolution of claims.

The High Court can refuse an application for a trial date if the applicant fails to comply with these requirements or fails to comply with an order of the Court or agreement between the parties relating to pleadings, discovery or otherwise.

The other party or parties can contest the application for a trial date, in which case the Court will treat the application as a case management hearing.

After a trial date has been fixed, if a party delivers further particulars, expert reports or a schedule of special damages without the consent of the Court, the opposing parties can apply for an adjournment of the trial date. The Court can make such costs order as it considers appropriate where an adjournment is deemed necessary.  

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.