Negligent ankle surgery? Negligent ankle surgery?

Negligent ankle surgery?

This case concerns the treatment of an ankle injury. Although the orthopaedic experts expressed fundamentally opposing views concerning the...
Quarterly Update on EWI's Advocacy Work Quarterly Update on EWI's Advocacy Work

Quarterly Update on EWI's Advocacy Work

One of the key roles of the Expert Witness Institute (‘EWI’) is to ensure that policy, rule and regulatory changes are informed by the...
A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

Veterinary surgeon, Jeremy Stattersfield, has been guiding courts on veterinary medicine since 1981. He told us how he got into the Expert Witness...
Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

In January's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss responding to written questions. We look at the rules and regulations, discuss a...
LMN v Swansea Bay University Health Board [2025] EWHC 3402 (KB) LMN v Swansea Bay University Health Board [2025] EWHC 3402 (KB)

LMN v Swansea Bay University Health Board [2025] EWHC 3402 (KB)

The claimant, who suffered brain damage at birth, relied on a report commenting on the allegation of negligence prepared by Mrs S, a midwife. The...
The first-time expert The first-time expert

The first-time expert

The details of this case are for gastroenterologists and psychiatrists. The learning points are of general application and although made by an expert...
Review of 2025 Review of 2025

Review of 2025

EWI Chief Executive Officer, Simon Berney-Edwards, shares his thoughts on 2025, a year where Expert Witnesses have continued to come under increasing...
The Isolation of Experts The Isolation of Experts

The Isolation of Experts

In this article, Dr Kay Linnell OBE talks about the role of the expert witness, and the problems that can be encountered when Instructing Parties go...
Podcast Episode 20: Review of 2025 Podcast Episode 20: Review of 2025

Podcast Episode 20: Review of 2025

Join us for the last podcast of 2025! With some festive cheer, we review 2025, with the ten key issues for expert witnesses that we've seen over...
A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

Mr Niall Craig is a Consultant Orthopaedic Spinal Surgeon and Expert Witness specialising in complex spinal cases. He tells us about his professional...
Podcast Episode 19: Transparency and Open Justice Podcast Episode 19: Transparency and Open Justice

Podcast Episode 19: Transparency and Open Justice

In this month's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we explore recent developments in Transparency and Open Justice. You can also catch our...
A Day in the Life of a Paramedical Skin Camouflage Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Paramedical Skin Camouflage Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Paramedical Skin Camouflage Expert Witness

Vanessa Jane Davies is the founder of Skin Camouflage Services, an independent expert practice offering paramedical skin camouflage, non-invasive scar...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Irish High Court introduces two new practice directions designed to streamline clinical negligence proceedings
Wiebke Morgan 2188

Irish High Court introduces two new practice directions designed to streamline clinical negligence proceedings

byWiebke Morgan

These come into effect on 28th April 2025

Practice direction HC132 provides for the establishment of a dedicated Clinical Negligence List within the Dublin Personal Injuries List of the High Court. This is intended to ensure clinical negligence matters receive focussed attention by experienced judges and that they benefit from enhanced case management.

This list will be managed by a High Court judge and will apply to all stages of clinical negligence proceedings.

The judge in charge can:

  • set timetables for the exchange of expert reports;
  • make directions for mediation;
  • make orders relating to witness statements or expert evidence; and
  • issue any other directions necessary to ensure fair and prompt resolution of proceedings.

New procedure for applying for a trial date

Practice direction HC131 introduces a new procedure for applying for a trial date in clinical negligence proceedings. The aim of the new procedure is to ensure cases are properly pleaded before a trial date is assigned and to facilitate the earlier resolution of clinical negligence actions. This should in turn decrease legal costs.

Under the new procedure, a party seeking to apply for a trial date must give the other parties 28 days’ notice of their intention to do so and must also complete a Certificate of Compliance for the Court. The requirement to complete such a certificate is a new requirement.

In the Certificate of Compliance, the party applying for a trial date must certify that:

  • they have fully pleaded all aspects of their case;
  • they have exchanged a complete schedule of all witnesses, factual and expert (or have offered to do so);
  • they have exchanged all expert reports intended to be relied upon at trial (or offered to do so); and
  • they undertake to offer mediation within 3 weeks of the date on which the trial date is fixed and to engage in mediation within 6 weeks of the offer being accepted. This requirement to offer mediation in this framework is new and we expect that this will lead to the earlier resolution of claims.

The High Court can refuse an application for a trial date if the applicant fails to comply with these requirements or fails to comply with an order of the Court or agreement between the parties relating to pleadings, discovery or otherwise.

The other party or parties can contest the application for a trial date, in which case the Court will treat the application as a case management hearing.

After a trial date has been fixed, if a party delivers further particulars, expert reports or a schedule of special damages without the consent of the Court, the opposing parties can apply for an adjournment of the trial date. The Court can make such costs order as it considers appropriate where an adjournment is deemed necessary.  

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.