Working with Expert Witnesses in Aviation Working with Expert Witnesses in Aviation

Working with Expert Witnesses in Aviation

Working with expert witnesses... is a new monthly article series. The series takes a look at the role of expert witnesses in a range of sectors from...
New EWI guidance on Marketing your Expert Witness Practice New EWI guidance on Marketing your Expert Witness Practice

New EWI guidance on Marketing your Expert Witness Practice

Whether you are just starting out as an Expert Witness or an experienced Expert Witness looking to increase the number of instructions you are...
Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice

Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice

In April's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a deep dive into Marketing your Expert Witness Practice, providing practical advice on...
Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge. Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge.

Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge.

Experts on Premex's panel have contacted the EWI to say that they will be subject to a15% service charge (plus VAT) on all invoices from 1 May...
DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2) DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2)

DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2)

This case, in the Court of Protection, concerned whether a wealthy, elderly man lacked capacity. The judgment dealt primarily with an application by...
Expert evidence in a vacuum of facts and startling use of Smart Glasses by the claimant Expert evidence in a vacuum of facts and startling use of Smart Glasses by the claimant

Expert evidence in a vacuum of facts and startling use of Smart Glasses by the claimant

In straying from their original instructions, the expert developed an opinion without all the facts of the case and the second claimant was being...
Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

In March's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss some recent examples of experts in the courts, drawing out the key learning points...
Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

In February's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at feedback and criticism. We go over the rules, discuss the key recent case...
A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

Dr Jane Duff is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Head of the National Spinal Injuries Centre Psychology Service, and an Expert Witness. Here, she...
A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

Veterinary surgeon, Jeremy Stattersfield, has been guiding courts on veterinary medicine since 1981. He told us how he got into the Expert Witness...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Fixed Recoverable Costs Interim Implementation Stocktake
Sean Mosby 980

Fixed Recoverable Costs Interim Implementation Stocktake

bySean Mosby

 

We are reposting our update on the Fixed Recoverable Costs Stocktake Consultation. It is important for the Civil Procedure Rule Committee's Stocktake to be fully informed by the knowledge and experiences of expert witnesses, so do please take the time to complete our survey by 21 December 2025.

Background

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee is undertaking a consultation regarding the effectiveness of the extension of Fixed Recoverable Costs (FRC), inviting feedback as part of an evidence-gathering initiative conducted in collaboration with the Ministry of Justice (MoJ).  The FRC regime prescribes the amount that can be recovered by the winning party at set stages of litigation, from pre-issue to the trial itself, with reference to a particular case type and track. The FRC regime was extended in October 2023.  

The consultation exercise will be followed by the MoJ’s full Post Implementation Review into the FRC regime as a whole, which is due to commence in 2026.

The consultation material comprises:

Responses

The EWI will be responding to the consultation and would appreciate your views and evidence on the questions set out in the Call for Evidence document. You can input into our response by filling out the survey: Fixed Recoverable Costs Interim Implementation Stocktake – Fill in form. The survey lists the questions asked in the Call for Evidence document. Just leave blank any questions that are not relevant.

Please ensure that you have reviewed the Cover sheet and Call for Evidence document before answering the questions as these documents provide important background and contextual information for the questions. You should compete the survey by 21 December 2025. 

All responses will be confidential and only anonymised details will be provided in our response to the Consultation. 

You can also respond to the Stocktake directly by submitting comments (in Word or PDF form) by 5 January 2026 to CPRCconsultation@justice.gov.uk with "Fixed Recoverable Costs (FRC) Interim Implementation Stocktake” in the subject line of your email.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.