A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness

Dr Richard Taylor is an Expert in the identification, verification and valuation of diamonds, gemstones, jewellery, watches, silver and antiques. He...
Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing

Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing

In the 16th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and Sean, discuss CV Writing. We look at the purpose of expert CVs, the rules and...
Losing a professional membership that underpins your credibility Losing a professional membership that underpins your credibility

Losing a professional membership that underpins your credibility

The claimant brought an action against two of its founding shareholders, and companies owned or controlled by them, seeking compensation for harm...
Ceto Shipping Corporation v Savory Shipping Inc [2025] EWHC 2033 (Comm) Ceto Shipping Corporation v Savory Shipping Inc [2025] EWHC 2033 (Comm)

Ceto Shipping Corporation v Savory Shipping Inc [2025] EWHC 2033 (Comm)

The claimant asserted that the defendant was required to transfer title in a vessel at the expiry of the bareboat counterparty between them. The judge...
Reliance on performance validity tests administered by psychiatrists Reliance on performance validity tests administered by psychiatrists

Reliance on performance validity tests administered by psychiatrists

This is a very important judgment for psychiatrists and psychologists who employ validity testing when assessing litigants. There were two experts,...
The Medical Expert in Court The Medical Expert in Court

The Medical Expert in Court

Fans of true crime and anyone involved in giving expert evidence might be interested in a recent podcast episode from EWI Fellow, Dr Harry Brunjes.
EWI partnership with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme EWI partnership with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme

EWI partnership with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme

The Expert Witness Institute has set up a new partnership with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme which is a collaborative initiative between the...
RICS consultation on Professional Standard for Surveyors acting as Expert Witnesses - 5th... RICS consultation on Professional Standard for Surveyors acting as Expert Witnesses - 5th...

RICS consultation on Professional Standard for Surveyors acting as Expert Witnesses - 5th...

The RICS is seeking feedback from public stakeholders on the updating of its Professional Standard for Surveyors Acting as Expert Witnesses. The...
Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness... Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

In the 15th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Membership Manager, Will Watkis, discuss the power of EWI membership and the...
A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

Marisa Shek is a Healthcare Architect and owner of Shek Architects. As an Expert Witness, she specialises in the field of accommodation for disabled...
Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025 Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

In the 14th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Marketing and Events Manger, Heather George, reflect on their highlights from...
A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

Susan Jones, founder of SJ Consultancy, has been a town planning consultant for over 40 years. As an Expert Witness, she provides evidence at public...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Expert's report failed to comply with practically every requirement
Simon Berney-Edwards 3323

Expert's report failed to comply with practically every requirement

bySimon Berney-Edwards

The recent judgment by Master David Cook in Pal -v- Damen [2022] EWHC 004697 (QB) demonstrates that judges will consider the compliance of reports when assessing the weight to place on expert evidence.

 

Mr Steyvers’ report failed to comply with practically every requirement. It appeared to me that he was acting as an advocate on behalf of his client’s position which is perhaps not surprising as he acts for the Surgeon in Belgium.

 

In the judgement, he concluded:

 

55. I conclude that I can place no weight upon the evidence of Mr Steyvers. The requirements of an expert’s report are set out in PD 35 §3.2: “An expert's report must:

  1. give details of the expert's qualifications;
  2. give details of any literature or other material which has been relied on in making the report;
  3. contain a statement setting out the substance of all facts and instructions which are material to the opinions expressed in the report or upon which those opinions are based;
  4. make clear which of the facts stated in the report are within the expert's own knowledge;
  5. say who carried out any examination, measurement, test or experiment which the expert has used for the report, give the qualifications of that person, and say whether or not the test or experiment has been carried out under the expert's supervision;
  6. where there is a range of opinion on the matters dealt with in the report –
    1. summarise the range of opinions; and
    2. give reasons for the expert's own opinion;
  7. contain a summary of the conclusions reached;
  8. if the expert is not able to give an opinion without qualification, state the qualification; and
  9. contain a statement that the expert –
    1. understands their duty to the court, and has complied with that duty; and
    2. is aware of the requirements of Part 35, this practice direction and the Guidance for the Instruction of Experts in Civil Claims 2014.”

 

56. Mr Steyvers’ report failed to comply with practically every requirement. It appeared to me that he was acting as an advocate on behalf of his client’s position which is perhaps not surprising as he acts for the Surgeon in Belgium. He did not give any proper consideration to the evidence of Ms Spronken and did not fully consider the available documentary evidence with the inevitable result that he did not provide a balanced opinion covering the range of possible opinions. The most obvious illustration of this tendency was his abrupt observation that Mr Beer’s report “contains a lot of mistakes and incorrect information”.

 

57. Mr Delvaux’s report was presented in a manner which complied with CPR 35 however, there are parts of his reasoning which do not withstand logical analysis, in particular his reference to the Court of Appeal of Liège case at §12 of his report. In my view and in agreement with Mr Beer the facts of this case are to be distinguished for reasons given by him in his supplemental report; on the basis of Ms Spronken’s uncontested evidence the Claimant did in fact have a choice of whether to proceed with the Surgeon and freely chose to do so. It was this issue which was the basis of Mr Delvaux’s opinion that there was an “all in” contract with the clinic.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.