New EWI guidance on Judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body... New EWI guidance on Judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body...

New EWI guidance on Judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body...

We have just published our new judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body complaints during a case. Our comprehensive guide is...
Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB) Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB)

Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB)

The dispute was between a former husband and wife, who were Russian nationals, about a post-nuptial agreement. The judge found that much of the expert...
Working with Expert Witnesses in Serious Injury Working with Expert Witnesses in Serious Injury

Working with Expert Witnesses in Serious Injury

Working with expert witnesses... is a new monthly article series. The series takes a look at the role of expert witnesses in a range of sectors from...
New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of practice New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of practice

New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of practice

The guidance sets out the text that you should use in your declarations for work undertaken in England and Wales for the English and Welsh Criminal...
Presbar Diecastings Limited v GW Atkins & Sons Limited & Anor Neutral Citation... Presbar Diecastings Limited v GW Atkins & Sons Limited & Anor Neutral Citation...

Presbar Diecastings Limited v GW Atkins & Sons Limited & Anor Neutral Citation...

The claimant was suing for the unpaid balance of the purchase price of assets used in its high-pressure aluminium diecasting business. The...
Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

In March's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss some recent examples of experts in the courts, drawing out the key learning points...
What were the effects of repeated sexual abuse at the hands of a schoolteacher? What were the effects of repeated sexual abuse at the hands of a schoolteacher?

What were the effects of repeated sexual abuse at the hands of a schoolteacher?

This case illustrates a number of difficulties for the adult victims of childhood sexual abuse. Diagnoses of psychiatric disorder in childhood have to...
Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

In February's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at feedback and criticism. We go over the rules, discuss the key recent case...
A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

Dr Jane Duff is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Head of the National Spinal Injuries Centre Psychology Service, and an Expert Witness. Here, she...
A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

Veterinary surgeon, Jeremy Stattersfield, has been guiding courts on veterinary medicine since 1981. He told us how he got into the Expert Witness...
Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

In January's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss responding to written questions. We look at the rules and regulations, discuss a...
A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

Mr Niall Craig is a Consultant Orthopaedic Spinal Surgeon and Expert Witness specialising in complex spinal cases. He tells us about his professional...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

EWI publishes new Guidance on Expert Discussions and Joint Statements
Sean Mosby 1997

EWI publishes new Guidance on Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

bySean Mosby

 

We have just refreshed our guidance on ‘Expert Discussions and Joint Statements' in the EWI Knowledge Hub (https://www.ewi.org.uk/Knowledge-Hub). Prepared with the input of members and the EWI Editorial Committee, the guidance includes lots of invaluable advice for navigating each of the key stages in expert discussions and joint statements, form and content, joint statement templates, and how to avoid the common pitfalls. 

Joint Statements are crucial documents in any proceeding. It is often the first thing that the court will read because it brings important clarity for the court and gives direction and structure to the proceedings, helping the court understand how the issues set out in the expert reports match together. It is also an early opportunity for your side to test the other side’s opinion.

Check out the tips below, before heading over to the Knowledge Hub! You can also book onto the next training session on Expert Discussion & Joint Statements - From Law to Practice - on 2 July 2025. 

  1. Before the experts’ discussion:

    1. Agree the ‘ground rules’ for the discussion. 

    2. Make sure you are completely familiar with the agenda and any questions you have been provided as well as your own and the opposing expert’s report. Give some thought before the meeting to the apparent areas of agreement and disagreement based on the reports.

    3. Where one of you has information that the other is lacking, it is important not to share the information directly with the opposing expert.

  2. During the experts’ discussion:

    1. Do not try to reach a compromise on the issues with the other expert. This is the role for the lawyers not the experts.

  3. Preparing the Joint Statement:

    1. At the end of the discussion agree how the joint statement will be drafted. Be aware of deadlines in the relevant procedural rules!

    2. There is no required format for the Joint Statement. Unless a format is directed by the court or set out by the instructing parties, you and your colleague are free to use the format that is most suitable for the case and the presentation of the expert evidence. Check out the EWI Knowledge Hub for joint statement templates that you can adapt for your use.

    3. Don’t forget to include the required restatement that the experts recognise their duties and, in the case of civil cases, an express statement that the experts have not been instructed to avoid reaching agreement on any matter within the experts’ competence. You can find these in the EWI Knowledge Hub.

    4. If you didn’t write it, carefully review the joint statement to make sure that it accurately represents your discussion.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.