When can you challenge an Expert Determination? When can you challenge an Expert Determination?

When can you challenge an Expert Determination?

The outcome of an Expert Determination is final and binding. However, there are circumstances in which the outcome can be appealed. The case of GSY...
Working with Expert Witnesses in Aviation Working with Expert Witnesses in Aviation

Working with Expert Witnesses in Aviation

Working with expert witnesses... is a new monthly article series. The series takes a look at the role of expert witnesses in a range of sectors from...
New EWI guidance on Marketing your Expert Witness Practice New EWI guidance on Marketing your Expert Witness Practice

New EWI guidance on Marketing your Expert Witness Practice

Whether you are just starting out as an Expert Witness or an experienced Expert Witness looking to increase the number of instructions you are...
Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice

Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice

In April's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a deep dive into Marketing your Expert Witness Practice, providing practical advice on...
Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge. Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge.

Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge.

Experts on Premex's panel have contacted the EWI to say that they will be subject to a15% service charge (plus VAT) on all invoices from 1 May...
A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness

We speak to Lynn Hannon, a learning disability and autism specialist nurse who works as an Expert Witness on quantum care assessments, loss of service...
Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in Northern Ireland; a tale of two experts Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in Northern Ireland; a tale of two experts

Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in Northern Ireland; a tale of two experts

Although the detail of McIntyre, R v [2026] NICC 2 will probably be of importance only for forensic science imagery analysts, it is important for...
DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2) DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2)

DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2)

This case, in the Court of Protection, concerned whether a wealthy, elderly man lacked capacity. The judgment dealt primarily with an application by...
Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

In March's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss some recent examples of experts in the courts, drawing out the key learning points...
Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

In February's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at feedback and criticism. We go over the rules, discuss the key recent case...
A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

Dr Jane Duff is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Head of the National Spinal Injuries Centre Psychology Service, and an Expert Witness. Here, she...
A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

Veterinary surgeon, Jeremy Stattersfield, has been guiding courts on veterinary medicine since 1981. He told us how he got into the Expert Witness...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Director of Public Prosecutions v O'Connor [2021] IECA 326
Priya Vaidya 2139

Director of Public Prosecutions v O'Connor [2021] IECA 326

byPriya Vaidya

The case: The respondent had pleaded guilty to three counts of possession of a firearm in suspicious circumstances and sentenced to a term of four years imprisonment, which sentence was suspended in full. The DPP applied seeking a review of the sentence on grounds of undue leniency. The respondent had been encountered driving a vehicle close to his home, and at that stage, he was in possession of keys belonging to another vehicle - a van - which was parked at the rear of the respondent’s dwelling. A warrant to search that vehicle was obtained. During the search, Gardaí discovered a sports bag, concealed in a hoover, which contained two packages wrapped in cling film. Each package contained a semiautomatic pistol, with fifteen live rounds of ammunition. During the course of the last interview, he referenced mental health difficulties that he had been experiencing. It is fair to say that the respondent’s approach was one of cooperation, and he followed this up by entering an early plea. During the course of the sentence hearing, it was accepted by investigating Gardaí that the respondent had been targeted by criminal elements to become involved, and that he was a vulnerable individual. The Court heard that there was a long history of mental health difficulties, including several suicide attempts: in 2004; in April 2019; and, most recently, in June 2019. The Court heard that apart from the respondent’s own mental health difficulties, which the investigating Garda described as “well documented”, it was also the situation that two of his brothers had died as a result of suicide. In terms of the respondent’s background and personal circumstances, he was 45 years of age and had no previous convictions. The Court heard that he had a good work record, including a lengthy period running his own business which was involved in sanding floors.

 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.