Login Join Us
A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal

A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal

We’re starting a new EWI series with A spotlight on… the Post Office Horizon Scandal which looks at how the Post Office failed to listen...
Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB) Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB)

Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB)

The case involved the question of whether the claimants should have permission to call expert security evidence.
Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation

Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee is consulting on proposed changes to the Civil Procedure Rules to ensure that courts consider alterative...
Expert evidence and an absent defendant Expert evidence and an absent defendant

Expert evidence and an absent defendant

A defendant who chose not to attend or be represented at trial, suggested that he might still instruct his expert witness to provide oral...
A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and... A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

EWI Honorary Fellow Tony Saggers has been a drug trafficking Expert Witness since 1995, alongside a career in law enforcement that spanned 30 years....
Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

The Forensic Science Regulator is consulting on the draft for the development of version 2 of the forensic science code of practice.

News

Bankole-Jones v Watford Borough Council [2020] EWHC 3100 (Admin)
Priya Vaidya
/ Categories: Case Updates

Bankole-Jones v Watford Borough Council [2020] EWHC 3100 (Admin)

The case: A statutory appeal under the Housing Act 1996, s 204 ("the 1996 Act") against a decision of the Respondent local authority to the effect that the Appellant was homeless and eligible for assistance, but that he was not in priority need. 

 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Commentary:  This case did not involve expert psychiatric evidence although the local authority’s reviewing officer had evidence as to the appellant’s mental health from primary care and mental health services. However, expert psychiatric evidence is sometimes obtained in such cases.

 

Learning point:

 

Where there is an issue as to homelessness assistance under the Housing Act 1996, the test for vulnerability arising from mental illness or handicap is a functional test: if there is a mental illness or handicap, make it clear whether or not, and if so to what extent and in what way, this affects the person’s ability to cope with homelessness.

 

 

 

Previous Article R v Weldemaryam [2020] EWCA Crim 1616
Next Article R (IJ (Kosovo)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWHC 3487 (Admin)
Print
472
Comments are only visible to subscribers.