Lorimer-Wing v Hashmi [2026] EWHC 1843 (Ch) Lorimer-Wing v Hashmi [2026] EWHC 1843 (Ch)

Lorimer-Wing v Hashmi [2026] EWHC 1843 (Ch)

The proceedings related to a petition asserting unfair prejudicial conduct of the affairs of a company. The expert witness who provided valuation...
Podcast Episode 29: Acting for Litigants in Person Podcast Episode 29: Acting for Litigants in Person

Podcast Episode 29: Acting for Litigants in Person

This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss acting for litigants in person. The accessibility of tools like generative AI is making...
A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness

Dr Frances Cranfield is a GP, Assistant Coroner, and a founding member of the Expert Witness Institute. With three decades of experience spanning...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Algorithms use in the Criminal Justice System
Anonym 4871

Algorithms use in the Criminal Justice System

by Anonym

Algorithms are becoming a way of life. Sitting in the background of the systems we use, they increasingly affect the information we see and the decisions we make.  Purchasing decisions, website personalisation, and suggestions and marketing on social networking sites are all driven by algorithms which harness our data to second guess our next move and make like easier for us.

 

Facebook now has facial recognition software which you can use to make it easy for you to automatically tag your friends. But think about that in the context of the justice system. Algorithms are already being used for facial recognition, DNA profiling, predictive crime mapping, and mobile data extraction.

 

Is it sufficient to rely on algorithms when the stakes are high?

 

As the commission notes “an uncritical reliance on technology could lead to wrong decisions that threaten human rights and undermine public trust in the justice system”.

 

The Technology and Law Commission were created to explore the issue and held public evidence sessions and received input from expert contributors as well as other written submissions.

 

There is an excellent Executive Summary which highlights the key challenges and their recommendations. But you can also access the full report on the Law Society website.

 

It will be interesting to see how this work is taken forward.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.