New EWI Guidance on Being instructed as a Single Joint Expert New EWI Guidance on Being instructed as a Single Joint Expert

New EWI Guidance on Being instructed as a Single Joint Expert

The EWI has just released its new Guidance on Being instructed as a Single Joint Expert with invaluable and easily accessible information and...
Fourth Amendment to the Criminal Practice Directions 2023 – November 2025 Fourth Amendment to the Criminal Practice Directions 2023 – November 2025

Fourth Amendment to the Criminal Practice Directions 2023 – November 2025

The Lady Chief Justice has issued the fourth amendment to the Criminal Practice Directions 2023 which includes changes to chapter 7 (Expert Evidence),...
O v C [2025] EWFC 334 O v C [2025] EWFC 334

O v C [2025] EWFC 334

A mother applied to set aside what she submitted were findings made five years ago by a district judge concerning the party’s...
Aaron Haley v Newcold Ltd [2025] EWCC 57 Aaron Haley v Newcold Ltd [2025] EWCC 57

Aaron Haley v Newcold Ltd [2025] EWCC 57

The Claimant alleged that an accident five years earlier was the cause of the amputation of his lower leg. The judge criticised the Claimant’s...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

MB v KB [2023] EWHC 3177 (Fam)
Case Updates

MB v KB [2023] EWHC 3177 (Fam)

An expert report did not address all of the questions posed in the letter of instruction, reformulated other questions, and failed to comply with FPR Part 25 in a number of important ways, while the expert witness's oral evidence failed to provide an impartial expert view. 

Expert Evidence and The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry
News

Expert Evidence and The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry

The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry is currently holding the public hearings for its phases 5 and 6, which will include scrutiny of the expert evidence relied on by the Post Office. We are proud that two members of EWI provided excellent, independent expert evidence or expert advice on the Horizon case. Their roles in the case demonstrate how important it is for Expert Witnesses to understand and apply the core competencies of the profession. 

The Cahill v Seepersad [2023] IEHC 583
Case Updates

The Cahill v Seepersad [2023] IEHC 583

The cout found that a financial expert's report was inadmissible as evidence because he was not properly independent or objective, while very little weight could be attributed to the report of an employment expert because he lacked expertise in the area in which he purported to give expert evidence. 

First1819202123252627Last