Login Join Us
A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal

A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal

We’re starting a new EWI series with A spotlight on… the Post Office Horizon Scandal which looks at how the Post Office failed to listen...
Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB) Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB)

Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB)

The case involved the question of whether the claimants should have permission to call expert security evidence.
Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation

Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee is consulting on proposed changes to the Civil Procedure Rules to ensure that courts consider alterative...
Expert evidence and an absent defendant Expert evidence and an absent defendant

Expert evidence and an absent defendant

A defendant who chose not to attend or be represented at trial, suggested that he might still instruct his expert witness to provide oral...
A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and... A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

EWI Honorary Fellow Tony Saggers has been a drug trafficking Expert Witness since 1995, alongside a career in law enforcement that spanned 30 years....
Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

The Forensic Science Regulator is consulting on the draft for the development of version 2 of the forensic science code of practice.

News

White, R. (on the application of) v Police Medical Appeal Board [2022] EWHC 385 (Admin)
Priya Vaidya
/ Categories: Case Updates

White, R. (on the application of) v Police Medical Appeal Board [2022] EWHC 385 (Admin)

The case: The Claimant used to be a serving police constable who has been retired due to various injuries and medical conditions. This judicial review concerns the entitlement of police constables to injury benefit pensions under the Police (Injury Benefit) Regulations 2006 (the 2006 Regulations).  It arises from the refusal of the SMP and the Defendant’s Board to accept that the Claimant came within the relevant legislation permitting an award based upon an organic injury which the Claimant alleges and the Defendant accepts that she suffered whilst on duty as a serving police constable in 2007.

 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

 

 

 

 

Previous Article Traylor v Kent and Medway NHS Social Care Partnership Trust [2022] EWHC 260 (QB)
Next Article Re Q [2022] EWCOP 6
Print
601
Comments are only visible to subscribers.