05 September 2024 Keith Rix 1700 Case Updates When is a summary not a summary? byKeith Rix Commentary The experts in this case appear to have set out a joint statement in the form of a Scott schedule. Unfortunately one of the experts used his column to set out lengthy texts and seemingly seeking to use the statement as a Trojan horse by which to introduce evidence that the court has excluded. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags 16. Criticism and Complaints13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements Related articles Why you must verify AI-generated content in your expert report Yodel Delivery Network Limited v Jacob Corlett & Ors [2025] EWHC 1435 (Ch) LMN v Swansea Bay University Health Board [2025] EWHC 3402 (KB) Review of 2025 Peter Marples & Ors v Secretary of State for Education [2025] EWHC 2794 (Ch) Switch article Kwik-Fit Properties Ltd v Resham Ltd [2024] EWCC 4 Previous Article The MCA’s belief requirement is wrong in law Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.