05 September 2024 Keith Rix 625 Case Updates When is a summary not a summary? byKeith Rix Commentary The experts in this case appear to have set out a joint statement in the form of a Scott schedule. Unfortunately one of the experts used his column to set out lengthy texts and seemingly seeking to use the statement as a Trojan horse by which to introduce evidence that the court has excluded. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags 13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements16. Criticism and Complaints Related articles Legal teams need to observe Expert’s fatigue & concentration EWI publishes new Guidance on Expert Discussions and Joint Statements Nothing short of a demolition of the expert's evidence Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from two Expert Quantity Surveyors A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert Switch article Kwik-Fit Properties Ltd v Resham Ltd [2024] EWCC 4 Previous Article The MCA’s belief requirement is wrong in law Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.