Dermot Speight & Ors (as trustees of the Thornaby Angling Association) v Robert James... Dermot Speight & Ors (as trustees of the Thornaby Angling Association) v Robert James...

Dermot Speight & Ors (as trustees of the Thornaby Angling Association) v Robert James...

The Claimants, who were trustees of an angling association which has fishing rights on the River Tees, asserted that the Defendant had interfered with...
EWI Guidance on Acting for Litigants in Person EWI Guidance on Acting for Litigants in Person

EWI Guidance on Acting for Litigants in Person

We have just published our Guidance for experts on acting for litigants in person. While our general advice to members is not to act for unrepresented...
Be cautious when accepting instructions from a Litigant in Person Be cautious when accepting instructions from a Litigant in Person

Be cautious when accepting instructions from a Litigant in Person

  The judgment dealt with the defendant's application for reverse summary judgment or to strike out the claimant's claim and the claimant's...
A Day in the Life of a Physiotherapy Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Physiotherapy Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Physiotherapy Expert Witness

Kathryn Rowe is an Expert Witness and Physiotherapist with over 17 years of clinical experience in neurological, spinal and orthopaedic...
Podcast Episode 29: Acting for Litigants in Person Podcast Episode 29: Acting for Litigants in Person

Podcast Episode 29: Acting for Litigants in Person

This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss acting for litigants in person. The accessibility of tools like generative AI is making...
Various Claimants v Mercedes-Benz Group and Others [2026] EWHC 1753 (KB) Various Claimants v Mercedes-Benz Group and Others [2026] EWHC 1753 (KB)

Various Claimants v Mercedes-Benz Group and Others [2026] EWHC 1753 (KB)

The trial dealt with liability issues relating to the alleged use of prohibited defeat devices. That is, devices which reduce the effectiveness of a...
Working with Expert Witnesses: Single Joint Experts Working with Expert Witnesses: Single Joint Experts

Working with Expert Witnesses: Single Joint Experts

In the fifth article in the Working with expert witnesses series, Richard Lodge a Partner at Stewarts, discusses his experience of working...
Expert Witnesses at a Turning Point Expert Witnesses at a Turning Point

Expert Witnesses at a Turning Point

This year’s Annual Conference discussed AI, independence, credibility, transparency and the changing expectations on expert witnesses.
Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026 Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026

Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026

This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at the EWI Annual Conference which was held on 19 June. The Conference got off to a great...
A Day in the Life of a Dangerous Dog Legislation Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Dangerous Dog Legislation Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Dangerous Dog Legislation Expert Witness

Shaun Hesmondhalgh has been an Expert Witness since 2016, specialising in cases involving dog welfare, dangerous dog behaviour, and dog-related human...
Podcast Episode 27: A case that changed me -  Tony Saggers Podcast Episode 27: A case that changed me - Tony Saggers

Podcast Episode 27: A case that changed me - Tony Saggers

In this month's in 'A case that changed me' we are talking with Tony Saggers who is a Threat, Risk and Harm consultant, with 30 years of...
A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness

Dr Frances Cranfield is a GP, Assistant Coroner, and a founding member of the Expert Witness Institute. With three decades of experience spanning...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from  two Expert Quantity Surveyors
Kim Highley 3550

Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from two Expert Quantity Surveyors

by Kim Highley

 

Summary

The complexities of this case required both parties to engage expert quantity surveyors.  Both sides approached their instructions to their expert from different angles which caused difficulties at trial.  This explained why the valuations were worlds apart (or as the judge commented they had a “manifestly excessive difference”) and needed some careful scrutiny and assessment by the judge. 

Whilst the approach of examining both valuations is very case specific, there are some fundamental tests which can be taken away.  An objective test was used several times as a benchmark looking at the scope of works that a ‘reasonable owner’ or ‘purchaser’ would require.  The key legal issue of “proportionality” was also visited frequently throughout the assessment of valuations. 

Learning points
Learning points for experts:
  • Keep in mind that reports and oral evidence should be factual.

  • Under cross-examination stay on track with your responses and don’t go beyond your field of expertise.

  • Stay clear of answering questions in a way that bolsters your client’s case.

  • Be familiar with the detail of the issues in your evidence.

  • There will be instances when you will be challenged on your evidence and need to make sensible concessions.  Particularly if you have made an error or where there is scope for a range of views.

  • Avoid arguments with counsel and ensure to answer their questions. 

  • It can go against your credibility if you don’t attempt to answer questions.

  • Approach cross-examination in a sensible and helpful manner thereby you will be more persuasive and reliable.

Learning points for instructing parties:
  • Ensure the expert grasps the matters in issue – fundamental for cross-examination.

  • Avoid a scenario which happened in this case where the judge felt that certain aspects of the expert’s evidence was work done by the instructing party’s team.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.