Access to Justice Inquiry Access to Justice Inquiry

Access to Justice Inquiry

The House of Commons, Justice Committee has published a Call for Evidence for its Inquiry on Access to Justice. The Inquiry will examine how advice...
Failed extraction of a wisdom tooth Failed extraction of a wisdom tooth

Failed extraction of a wisdom tooth

Although this is a case of alleged dental negligence and can be usefully read in full not only by dental experts, but by dentists, oral surgeons and...
A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

Marisa Shek is a Healthcare Architect and owner of Shek Architects. As an Expert Witness, she specialises in the field of accommodation for disabled...
Benjamin Hetherington (by his father and litigation friend Gary Hetherington) v Raymond... Benjamin Hetherington (by his father and litigation friend Gary Hetherington) v Raymond...

Benjamin Hetherington (by his father and litigation friend Gary Hetherington) v Raymond...

The judge found that an expert on risk assessment adopted an overly strict and slightly unrealistic approach in assessing the adequacy of a risk...
Bevan v Ministry of Defence [2025] EWHC 1145 (KB) Bevan v Ministry of Defence [2025] EWHC 1145 (KB)

Bevan v Ministry of Defence [2025] EWHC 1145 (KB)

Apart from the oft-made point about the importance for experts of the chronology, especially in cases where the issue is causation or clinical...
The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025 The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

The Criminal Procedure Rule Committee has published a new consolidation of the Criminal Procedure Rules and an accompanying guide. The new Rules will...
Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives

Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives

The Transparency and Open Justice Board has published its final Key Objectives and its response to its Public Engagement on the proposed Key...
Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025 Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

In the 14th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Marketing and Events Manger, Heather George, reflect on their highlights from...
A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

Susan Jones, founder of SJ Consultancy, has been a town planning consultant for over 40 years. As an Expert Witness, she provides evidence at public...
Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

In the 13th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at five long-standing policy issues that have had significant developments recently: (1)...
A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

Dr. Rohit Seth is trained in Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hair Transplant Surgery with over 20 years of surgical experience. A practicing...
Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

In the 12th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss Expert Discussions and Joint Statements. Joint Statements are critical documents in any...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from  two Expert Quantity Surveyors
Kim Highley 893

Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from two Expert Quantity Surveyors

byKim Highley

 

Summary

The complexities of this case required both parties to engage expert quantity surveyors.  Both sides approached their instructions to their expert from different angles which caused difficulties at trial.  This explained why the valuations were worlds apart (or as the judge commented they had a “manifestly excessive difference”) and needed some careful scrutiny and assessment by the judge. 

Whilst the approach of examining both valuations is very case specific, there are some fundamental tests which can be taken away.  An objective test was used several times as a benchmark looking at the scope of works that a ‘reasonable owner’ or ‘purchaser’ would require.  The key legal issue of “proportionality” was also visited frequently throughout the assessment of valuations. 

Learning points
Learning points for experts:
  • Keep in mind that reports and oral evidence should be factual.

  • Under cross-examination stay on track with your responses and don’t go beyond your field of expertise.

  • Stay clear of answering questions in a way that bolsters your client’s case.

  • Be familiar with the detail of the issues in your evidence.

  • There will be instances when you will be challenged on your evidence and need to make sensible concessions.  Particularly if you have made an error or where there is scope for a range of views.

  • Avoid arguments with counsel and ensure to answer their questions. 

  • It can go against your credibility if you don’t attempt to answer questions.

  • Approach cross-examination in a sensible and helpful manner thereby you will be more persuasive and reliable.

Learning points for instructing parties:
  • Ensure the expert grasps the matters in issue – fundamental for cross-examination.

  • Avoid a scenario which happened in this case where the judge felt that certain aspects of the expert’s evidence was work done by the instructing party’s team.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.