Nord Stream AG v Lloyd's Insurance Company SA & Anor Neutral Citation Number[2026] EWHC... Nord Stream AG v Lloyd's Insurance Company SA & Anor Neutral Citation Number[2026] EWHC...

Nord Stream AG v Lloyd's Insurance Company SA & Anor Neutral Citation Number[2026] EWHC...

The operator of the Nord Stream pipeline was suing insurance companies for damages caused to the pipelines by explosions which rendered them...
X and Y (Care Proceedings: Publication of Judgment: Criticism of Expert Witness), Re X and Y (Care Proceedings: Publication of Judgment: Criticism of Expert Witness), Re

X and Y (Care Proceedings: Publication of Judgment: Criticism of Expert Witness), Re

In her judgment on X and Y (Care Proceedings: Fact Finding: Death of a Child), the Judge was highly critical of the evidence and conduct during...
Expert Witnesses at a Turning Point Expert Witnesses at a Turning Point

Expert Witnesses at a Turning Point

This year’s Annual Conference discussed AI, independence, credibility, transparency and the changing expectations on expert witnesses.
Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026 Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026

Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026

This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at the EWI Annual Conference which was held on 19 June. The Conference got off to a great...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Make sure you pay your expert!
Simon Berney-Edwards 4408

Make sure you pay your expert!

by Simon Berney-Edwards

Law Society Gazette reports on a case where an Expert Witness refused to act after accusing solicitors of not paying him and naming him on cases without his knowledge.

 

The allegations came to light in a pre-trial review where the judge read out correspondence from the Expert Witness who accused the law firm of naming him on cases and then issuing instructions after the event and for not paying long overdue invoices.

 

The claimant had applied for a six-month extension to liaise with the expert. But this was disallowed.

 

The non-payment of Expert Witnesses continues to be an issue that our members face and where they have had continuing issues, we do recommend that they consider approaching the Judge for direction.

 

This highlights both the importance for legal teams in ensuring their Expert Witnesses are paid and for experts in knowing that they can seek advice from our member helpline and seek advice from the judge.

 

Read the article here

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.