23 August 2021 Wiebke Morgan 3510 Case Updates Kwikbolt Limited v Airbus Operations Limited [2021] EWHC 732 (IPEC) by Wiebke Morgan The case: A patent case Judgment as to the conduct of the expert witnesses: Mr Vanhegan's submissions on Mr X as a witness mirrored those of Mr Ward on Mr Y: he was a good witness in cross-examination doing his best to help the court, but his report was not satisfactory. Each legal team was, by implication, accusing the other of having an overbearing influence on its expert. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Expert's behaviour11. Report Writing08. Working with Instructing Parties Related articles Craigard (Dartford) Limited & Anor v Westbury Homes (Holdings) Limited & Anor [2026] EWHC 2453 (TCC) EWI Study Day 2026– Mastering the Witness Box: From Preparation to Persuasion Instructed Late, Judged Early: What the Ciarb 2026 report on expert witnesses asks of experts, tribunals and counsel A medical report to which the court gave little weight DLP Ltd v Coram UK Holding Ltd [2026] EWHC 2448 (IPEC) (25 September 2026) Switch article R v Lall [2021] EWCA Crim 404, 2021 WL 01041724 Previous Article Towuaghantse v General Medical Council [2021] EWHC 681 (Admin) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.