Login Join Us
Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB) Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB)

Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB)

The case involved the question of whether the claimants should have permission to call expert security evidence.
Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation

Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee is consulting on proposed changes to the Civil Procedure Rules to ensure that courts consider alterative...
Expert evidence and an absent defendant Expert evidence and an absent defendant

Expert evidence and an absent defendant

A defendant who chose not to attend or be represented at trial, suggested that he might still instruct his expert witness to provide oral...
EWI welcomes government action on unregulated expert witnesses EWI welcomes government action on unregulated expert witnesses

EWI welcomes government action on unregulated expert witnesses

In a Parliamentary debate, Lord Bellamy, a Minister of Justice, noted the neeed for the Family Procedure Rule Comitttee to develop a...
A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and... A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

EWI Honorary Fellow Tony Saggers has been a drug trafficking Expert Witness since 1995, alongside a career in law enforcement that spanned 30 years....
Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

The Forensic Science Regulator is consulting on the draft for the development of version 2 of the forensic science code of practice.

News

DPP v FN [2022] IESC 22
Priya Vaidya
/ Categories: Case Updates

DPP v FN [2022] IESC 22

The case: The accused, aged 14 years at the time of the offence, was guilty of sexual assault on the 6-year-old victim. In the context of playacting in a field near his family home, which may have involved, either on that day or the previous day, play fighting of a very mild kind with sticks, and out of sight of the victim’s father, the accused pulled down the victim’s pants and underpants. While the victim was pushed down and was prone on the ground, the accused hit the victim on his bare buttocks “a few times”, clarified after counting by the victim on his fingers as “nine times” and that this was like “a big smack” so that “it was sore.”

 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Previous Article Begum v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKAITUR HU205022019
Next Article Mooreland and Owenvarragh Residents’ Association, Re Application for Judicial Review [2022] NIQB 40
Print
760
Comments are only visible to subscribers.