Nord Stream AG v Lloyd's Insurance Company SA & Anor Neutral Citation Number[2026] EWHC... Nord Stream AG v Lloyd's Insurance Company SA & Anor Neutral Citation Number[2026] EWHC...

Nord Stream AG v Lloyd's Insurance Company SA & Anor Neutral Citation Number[2026] EWHC...

The operator of the Nord Stream pipeline was suing insurance companies for damages caused to the pipelines by explosions which rendered them...
X and Y (Care Proceedings: Publication of Judgment: Criticism of Expert Witness), Re X and Y (Care Proceedings: Publication of Judgment: Criticism of Expert Witness), Re

X and Y (Care Proceedings: Publication of Judgment: Criticism of Expert Witness), Re

In her judgment on X and Y (Care Proceedings: Fact Finding: Death of a Child), the Judge was highly critical of the evidence and conduct during...
Expert Witnesses at a Turning Point Expert Witnesses at a Turning Point

Expert Witnesses at a Turning Point

This year’s Annual Conference discussed AI, independence, credibility, transparency and the changing expectations on expert witnesses.
Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026 Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026

Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026

This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at the EWI Annual Conference which was held on 19 June. The Conference got off to a great...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Commissioning a report from a third party expert on one of the issues the Expert Witness has been instructed to consider
Simon Berney-Edwards 3329

Commissioning a report from a third party expert on one of the issues the Expert Witness has been instructed to consider

by Simon Berney-Edwards

Question: 

Is it acceptable for an Expert Witness to commission a report from a third party expert on one of the issues the Expert Witness has been instructed on and then use the third party expert opinion in their report?

 

Answer:

If there is a particular aspect of a matter which is outside your own expertise but needs to be addressed, particularly if it needs to be addressed before you can form a proper view on the matters within your expertise, you should flag this to the instructing solicitor and get them to procure a report from the other expert or to instruct you jointly.  You should contact them to explain what is needed and why. At the same time, you could suggest an expert who could provide that expertise; however, it is for the Instructing Party to make the appointment. If that opinion is crucial to your own opinion, you should then wait to see what the solicitors state before preparing their draft report on inadequate evidence.

 

Don’t forget that in court proceedings (and sometimes also in arbitration) the instructions to the expert must be disclosed to the opposing party. There is no orderly way of achieving this if the expert goes off on their own to instruct another expert.

 

Where an addition report is being relied on, you could consider appending the other experts report to yours and explain within your report that you are relying on xx report in relation to a specific area.

 

This does not apply, of course, to the commonplace situation in which the expert gets a team acting under their supervision to undertake tests or carry out research. In that scenario the position should be spelled out in the report and in an ideal world the members of the team identified somewhere, even in an annexe.

 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.