09 October 2024 Sean Mosby 2731 Case Updates Chifley Holdings Ltd (BVI) v The Commissioners For HMRC [2024] UKUT 301 (LC) by Sean Mosby Summary The judge found that it was without justification and entirely unecessary for an expert to question the opposing expert's professionalism and motives in selecting evidence, noting that this approach was unhelpful for the tribunal. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgement Share Print Tags 16. Criticism and Complaints10. Records Assessments and Site VisitsSurveyorsValuation06. Rules and Regulations11. Report Writing14. Changing your opinion13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements15. Giving Oral Evidence Related articles Lessons for Expert Witnesses from O'Neill v Scottish Ambulance Service Board: Independence, Expertise and the Boundaries of Expert Opinion in Remote Clinical Triage Advocate Economists and the Competition Appeal Tribunal EWI Annual Conference 2026: Opening keynote tackles the use of AI in Expert Reports Do not leave it until cross-examination to reveal your true opinion A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness Switch article Fact finding by experts Previous Article Professor Keith Rix and Alison Somek awarded Honorary Fellowship of the EWI Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.