09 October 2024 Sean Mosby 3459 Case Updates Chifley Holdings Ltd (BVI) v The Commissioners For HMRC [2024] UKUT 301 (LC) by Sean Mosby Summary The judge found that it was without justification and entirely unecessary for an expert to question the opposing expert's professionalism and motives in selecting evidence, noting that this approach was unhelpful for the tribunal. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgement Share Print Tags 16. Criticism and Complaints10. Records Assessments and Site VisitsSurveyorsValuation06. Rules and Regulations11. Report Writing14. Changing your opinion13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements15. Giving Oral Evidence Related articles Civil Justice Council’s Use of AI for Preparing Court Documents: Final Report The combative paediatric expert remains anonymous Craigard (Dartford) Limited & Anor v Westbury Homes (Holdings) Limited & Anor [2026] EWHC 2453 (TCC) EWI Study Day 2026– Mastering the Witness Box: From Preparation to Persuasion A medical report to which the court gave little weight Switch article Fact finding by experts Previous Article Professor Keith Rix and Alison Somek awarded Honorary Fellowship of the EWI Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.