New EWI guidance on Judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body... New EWI guidance on Judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body...

New EWI guidance on Judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body...

We have just published our new judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body complaints during a case. Our comprehensive guide is...
Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB) Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB)

Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB)

The dispute was between a former husband and wife, who were Russian nationals, about a post-nuptial agreement. The judge found that much of the expert...
Working with Expert Witnesses in Serious Injury Working with Expert Witnesses in Serious Injury

Working with Expert Witnesses in Serious Injury

Working with expert witnesses... is a new monthly article series. The series takes a look at the role of expert witnesses in a range of sectors from...
New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of practice New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of practice

New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of practice

The guidance sets out the text that you should use in your declarations for work undertaken in England and Wales for the English and Welsh Criminal...
Presbar Diecastings Limited v GW Atkins & Sons Limited & Anor Neutral Citation... Presbar Diecastings Limited v GW Atkins & Sons Limited & Anor Neutral Citation...

Presbar Diecastings Limited v GW Atkins & Sons Limited & Anor Neutral Citation...

The claimant was suing for the unpaid balance of the purchase price of assets used in its high-pressure aluminium diecasting business. The...
Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

In March's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss some recent examples of experts in the courts, drawing out the key learning points...
What were the effects of repeated sexual abuse at the hands of a schoolteacher? What were the effects of repeated sexual abuse at the hands of a schoolteacher?

What were the effects of repeated sexual abuse at the hands of a schoolteacher?

This case illustrates a number of difficulties for the adult victims of childhood sexual abuse. Diagnoses of psychiatric disorder in childhood have to...
Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

In February's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at feedback and criticism. We go over the rules, discuss the key recent case...
A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

Dr Jane Duff is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Head of the National Spinal Injuries Centre Psychology Service, and an Expert Witness. Here, she...
A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

Veterinary surgeon, Jeremy Stattersfield, has been guiding courts on veterinary medicine since 1981. He told us how he got into the Expert Witness...
Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

In January's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss responding to written questions. We look at the rules and regulations, discuss a...
A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

Mr Niall Craig is a Consultant Orthopaedic Spinal Surgeon and Expert Witness specialising in complex spinal cases. He tells us about his professional...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Bevan v Ministry of Defence [2025] EWHC 1145 (KB)
Keith Rix 2238

Bevan v Ministry of Defence [2025] EWHC 1145 (KB)

byKeith Rix

 

Commentary

Apart from the oft-made point about the importance for experts of the chronology, especially in cases where the issue is causation or clinical negligence, there is nothing in this case for healthcare experts in general. It is an importance case for ENT experts because several similar claims are due to be heard over the next months. 

Case

Between 2017 and 2020 the Claimant, then a serving soldier, was negligently exposed to dangerous and unsafe levels of noise by the Defendant when testing Ajax armoured vehicles at the manufacturer’s premises. He wore a headset (Bowman combat II) covering his right ear whilst inside the vehicle, which was used for communication with others and to receive alarm warnings from the vehicle. This was his claim for damages in respect of a hearing injury said to have been caused by that exposure. It is the first of several similar claims due to be heard in this court over the next months. Breach of duty has been admitted, causation and (to the extent necessary) quantum are in issue. This judgment deals with causation.

Before considering the various mechanisms which might have brought about the injury, the judge made two important points.

First, Mr Bevan said he suffered 2 types of injury: The primary injury was hearing loss and tinnitus (which are connected). In addition, he suffered psychological damage as a result of the tinnitus in the form of a "conversion disorder" (or functional neurological disorder (FND) which led to non-organic hearing loss. If the primary injury was not caused by the negligent exposure the relevance of FND falls away.

Secondly, hearing loss and tinnitus can (and often do) occur without any injury or fault at all. The cause of these issues may be very difficult to identify. The ENT experts agreed that "a significant number of individuals with hearing loss/tinnitus never have an underlying cause diagnosed, even with the very best investigation."

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.