Extradition and suicide risk Extradition and suicide risk

Extradition and suicide risk

This case is important for two reasons. It illustrates that having “no control over actions” and “not making a rational...
Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives

Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives

The Transparency and Open Justice Board has published its final Key Objectives and its response to its Public Engagement on the proposed Key...
A fundamentally flawed report A fundamentally flawed report

A fundamentally flawed report

The parties unanimously agreed that the report of a Court appointed expert was fundamentally flawed, could not be relied upon, and a new psychologist...
Referral of Release Decisions Consultation: proposed amendments to CPR Part 77 and... Referral of Release Decisions Consultation: proposed amendments to CPR Part 77 and...

Referral of Release Decisions Consultation: proposed amendments to CPR Part 77 and...

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee ('Committee') is consulting on proposed amendments to the Civil Procedure Rules Part 77 and the Practice...
Expert evidence and the materiality of a risk Expert evidence and the materiality of a risk

Expert evidence and the materiality of a risk

Although this is an orthopaedic case and in which given its preliminary nature the expert evidence was not tested, it is helpful for experts in...
Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025 Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

In the 14th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Marketing and Events Manger, Heather George, reflect on their highlights from...
Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

In the 13th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at five long-standing policy issues that have had significant developments recently: (1)...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Access to public domain documents pilot
Sean Mosby 701

Access to public domain documents pilot

bySean Mosby

 

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee has approved in principle a 2-year pilot on “access to public domain documents” in the Commercial Court, London Circuit Court and the Financial List effective from 1 October 2025. The pilot was recommended by the sub-Committee which is reviewing the Committee’s implementation of access to court documents. You can read the background to this issue at: The EWI’s view on the Civil Procedure Rule Committee Court Documents Consultation and Update on Civil Procedure Rule Committee Access to Court Documents Proposals.

The pilot will be implemented by a new pilot PD under CPR Part 51: Transitional Arrangements and Pilot Schemes.

The aims and purpose of the pilot are to advance the principle of open justice in the civil courts by testing a relatively simple protocol which works within the Court’s existing systems. The pilot is designed to maximise accessibility for the public without adding to the burden on court staff. The Committee noted that it represents both a tempered approach and a more gradual introduction of changes than its earlier proposals.

The Committee expects to publish the guidance and pilot PD in July as part of the October 2025 common-commencement date. The sub-committee will consider and propose plans to monitor and evaluate the operation of the pilot PD in practice.

We will look forward to further details on the pilot being published in July and are hopeful that the Committee has taken into account the concerns we raised in our response to the consultation on its earlier proposals.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.