Login Join Us
A court cannot ignore an unchallenged expert report A court cannot ignore an unchallenged expert report

A court cannot ignore an unchallenged expert report

The High Court found that the Crown Court was bound to accept an uncontested expert report if it did not have a valid reasons for departing from the...
Expert Witness Survey - Equal Representation Expert Witness Survey - Equal Representation

Expert Witness Survey - Equal Representation

Take 5 minutes to help monitor progress
Appeal in the Cause Michael Marshall against Berkshire Hathaway International Insurance... Appeal in the Cause Michael Marshall against Berkshire Hathaway International Insurance...

Appeal in the Cause Michael Marshall against Berkshire Hathaway International Insurance...

The sheriff appeal court upheld the sheriff's award of damages for injuries sustained in a vehicle accident which were assessed, in the...
A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and... A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

EWI Honorary Fellow Tony Saggers has been a drug trafficking Expert Witness since 1995, alongside a career in law enforcement that spanned 30 years....
Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

The Forensic Science Regulator is consulting on the draft for the development of version 2 of the forensic science code of practice.

News

New edition of the Commercial Court Guide issue

New edition of the Commercial Court Guide issue

The judiciary published the 11th Edition of the Commercial Courts Guide in February 2022.

 

Whilst there are a number of re-writes which make no material difference, Expert Witnesses need to be aware of two key changes.

 

The first is the inclusion of a paragraph which highlights that experts should not deliberately hold back matters from discussion at the joint meeting or inclusion within the Joinst Statement opting instead to create a supplemental report:

 

"H2.25    If the joint memorandum is done well, further (reply) expert reports will often not be required, even if permission has been given for them. It is generally inappropriate for an expert to decline to reveal, or provide a summary for inclusion in the joint memorandum of, their reasons for maintaining some point of disagreement, in order to set it out instead in a further (reply) report. If time does not allow the joint memorandum to do justice to some area of disagreement, for example if further modelling, calculations or research may need to be conducted, that fact, and the nature of any further work to be done by either expert, should be explained in the joint memorandum."

 

The second is a new section relating to Expert Evidence of Foreign Law.

 

If you undertake work in this court, we strongly recommend you review the new guidance. You can access this using the link below.

Previous Article £225k worth of Expert Evidence revoked due to conduct of Expert Witness
Next Article EWI awards Honorary Fellowship to James Badenoch QC, Roger Clements and Chris Pamplin
Print
2168
Comments are only visible to subscribers.