Working with Expert Witnesses: Joint Expert Meetings Working with Expert Witnesses: Joint Expert Meetings

Working with Expert Witnesses: Joint Expert Meetings

In the sixth article in the Working with expert witnesses series, Alexandra Winch a Partner at Stewarts, discusses her experience of...
EWI releases workforce mapping research report EWI releases workforce mapping research report

EWI releases workforce mapping research report

This research has provided the first-ever assessment of the size and characteristics of the Expert Witness workforce in the UK.
Podcast Episode 30: Mapping the Expert Witness Workforce Podcast Episode 30: Mapping the Expert Witness Workforce

Podcast Episode 30: Mapping the Expert Witness Workforce

This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Membership Manager, Will Watkiss, discuss the EWI's project to map the Expert Witness...
EWI Guidance on Acting for Litigants in Person EWI Guidance on Acting for Litigants in Person

EWI Guidance on Acting for Litigants in Person

We have revised our recently published Guidance for experts on acting for litigants in person. After engagement with members, we have decided to amend...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Rebecca Lochrie v Matthew Edwards Judgment G48YJ355
Sean Mosby 3292

Rebecca Lochrie v Matthew Edwards Judgment G48YJ355

by Sean Mosby

 

Summary

The Claimant alleged that the Defendant acted negligently in obtaining her consent for laser eye surgery including failing to adequately investigate her ophthalmic condition prior to the surgery.

Learning points

Learning points for experts

  • The relevant guidance, consenting practices and professional understanding are those which were current at the time of the alleged negligence.  

  • When considering whether to accept an instruction, carefully consider your expertise and experience in the matters for expert evidence.

  • If appropriate, make sure you explain clearly to your instructing party how any limitations in your expertise and experience could limit your ability to provide expert evidence on any of the issues in the case.

  • If the opposing expert has greater expertise or experience than you in a matter for expert evidence, make sure your instructing party understands that the opposing expert’s evidence may carry more weight with the court on the point or points in question.

Learning points for instructing parties

  • Try to instruct the expert witness with the most specific expertise and experience you can in the matters for expert evidence.

  • A judge will often prefer practical, hands-on experience over academic research, although this will not always be the case.

  • If the opposing expert has greater expertise or experience than your expert in a matter for expert evidence, make sure you discuss this with your expert so that you understand how it might impact the relative strength of their respective evidence.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.