RICS consultation on Professional Standard for Surveyors acting as Expert Witnesses - 5th... RICS consultation on Professional Standard for Surveyors acting as Expert Witnesses - 5th...

RICS consultation on Professional Standard for Surveyors acting as Expert Witnesses - 5th...

The RICS is seeking feedback from public stakeholders on the updating of its Professional Standard for Surveyors Acting as Expert Witnesses. The...
Investigating possible non-accidental injuries in children Investigating possible non-accidental injuries in children

Investigating possible non-accidental injuries in children

In this case of suspected non-accidental injuries to an infant, only one of the experts was required to give evidence. This was Professor Fleming and...
The Expert Witness Institute and Expert Insight Announce Strategic Partnership to Elevate... The Expert Witness Institute and Expert Insight Announce Strategic Partnership to Elevate...

The Expert Witness Institute and Expert Insight Announce Strategic Partnership to Elevate...

The Expert Witness Institute, the UK’s leading body for expert witnesses, is proud to announce a new partnership with Expert Insight, a...
DHV (A Protected Party through his Litigation Friend WTX) v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2025]... DHV (A Protected Party through his Litigation Friend WTX) v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2025]...

DHV (A Protected Party through his Litigation Friend WTX) v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2025]...

The Claimant brought a claim for compensation in the UK after he was hit by an uninsured driver while on holiday in Mallorca and suffered major...
Loose talk, snide remarks and the expertise of general practitioners Loose talk, snide remarks and the expertise of general practitioners

Loose talk, snide remarks and the expertise of general practitioners

This is an important case for three reasons. First, it found that a general practitioner, giving evidence about the depressive disorder diagnosed...
Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness... Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

In the 15th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Membership Manager, Will Watkis, discuss the power of EWI membership and the...
How should Experts disclose criticisms when they are frequently unaware of the outcome of... How should Experts disclose criticisms when they are frequently unaware of the outcome of...

How should Experts disclose criticisms when they are frequently unaware of the outcome of...

The judgement from The Honourable Mr Justice Trower asserts that Expert Witnesses have a duty to disclose previous criticisms of their evidence in...
A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

Marisa Shek is a Healthcare Architect and owner of Shek Architects. As an Expert Witness, she specialises in the field of accommodation for disabled...
Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025 Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

In the 14th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Marketing and Events Manger, Heather George, reflect on their highlights from...
A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

Susan Jones, founder of SJ Consultancy, has been a town planning consultant for over 40 years. As an Expert Witness, she provides evidence at public...
Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

In the 13th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at five long-standing policy issues that have had significant developments recently: (1)...
A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

Dr. Rohit Seth is trained in Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hair Transplant Surgery with over 20 years of surgical experience. A practicing...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Independence, bias and conflicts of interest
Emma Mitra 1529

Independence, bias and conflicts of interest

byEmma Mitra

Our annual Sir Michael Davies lecture is always a highlight on the EWI calendar. This year, we welcomed The Hon Mr Justice Trower, a British High Court judge and member of The Civil Procedure Rule Committee, to deliver the speech.

Mr Justice Trower gave a fascinating look into the theme of ‘Independence, bias and conflicts of interest: when might the independence of an expert’s evidence be regarded by the court as compromised, and what are the consequences when it is?’.

Read a summary of his key insights below and purchase acccess to the lecture in full here.

Listening to the lecture can be logged as ½ CPD hours.

 

Independence and what it means for Expert Witnesses

  • Independence is an issue that every Expert will have to think about – whatever the nature or their expertise or the setting in which their evidence is given.
  • Any hint of a lack of independence can prove fertile ground for a submission that an expert’s opinion should be afforded little weight, or in an extreme case rejected altogether.
  • The concept of independence is spelt out in the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Part 35 Practice Direction and the Guidance of the Instruction of Experts in Civil Claims.
  • The CPR and the authorities have described the concept of independence as being focused on the Expert evidence, rather than whether the Expert can properly be characterised as objectively ‘independent’ as an individual. 
  • A helpful way of thinking about independence as an Expert is the absence of dependency. The creation of an independent work product involves conduct which is autonomous and not subject to the authority, control or inappropriate influence of another person or their interest or view.
  • Discussions between lawyers and experts should not led to the preparation of Expert Reports which include material drafted by lawyers or, more subtly, drafting guided by them. There are few things more damaging to the credibility and usefulness a report if it reads like a crafted piece of written advocacy.

 

Conflicts of interest and potential bias

  • Conflicts of interest don’t always render expert evidence inadmissible, but full details of the nature of that interest must always be disclosed: if in doubt about any pre-existing relationship, make full disclosure.
  • There’s a distinction between the admissibility of evidence adduced from an Expert who has a pre-existing relationship with the party by whom they are instructed, and the weight it will be accorded by the court when deciding the case.
  • An Expert in this position can expect to be challenged on the independence of their work product during the course of cross examination to test their willingness and ability to carry out their primary duty to the court.
  • In its most extreme form, conscious bias arises where an Expert willingly offers whatever opinion is required, without regard to whether it reflects their considered views.
  • Unconscious bias is a trickier problem and flows from what a respected Australian judge (Justice Peter McClellan) has called “the influence of the inevitable human desire to win the debate”. Experts who regularly give evidence for the same client are likely to be more prone to this phenomenon than those who do not. 
  • Perhaps the best form of defence against unconscious bias is that Experts with integrity should always remember that, although the desire to win is a natural human condition, they are not a competitor in the race. They are simply there to help the umpire achieve the just result.

 

Listen to the Sir Michael Davies lecture in full and earn ½ CPD hours.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.