21 January 2026 Sean Mosby 1330 Case Updates Why you must verify AI-generated content in your expert report bySean Mosby Summary The Court excluded consideration of the expert testimony of an expert on the dangers of AI and misinformation, after he submitted an expert declaration which included fake AI-generated citations to two academic articles. Learning points Learning points for experts Don’t use an AI tool unless you fully understand it. Consider seeking training if you are not fully confident with the tool. Generative AI tools can be extremely useful for research, but it is vital to verify the information they provide. Don’t assume that, because the AI generated material is in your area of expertise, you will be able to pick up any errors ‘by eye’. If you haven’t already, review our article on How not to use AI in expert evidence and listen to our podcast on AI and the Expert Witness. Be cautious in citing an academic article that you haven’t read. Learning points for instructing parties Ask the experts you instruct if, and if so how, they intend to use AI in preparing their expert evidence. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment How not to use AI in expert evidence Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness Share Print Tags 16. Criticism and ComplaintsArtificial IntelligenceAI11. Report WritingMinnesotaUnited States Related articles Car-Wizard Limited v Vixen Surface Treatments Limited [2026] EWHC 685 (Ch) Working with Expert Witnesses in Clinical Negligence Claims: Practical Considerations and Common Pitfalls David Abbott & Ors v Ministry of Defence [2026] EWHC 941 (KB) Previous criticism used to highlight defects in expert evidence A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness Comments are only visible to subscribers.