22 May 2026 Sean Mosby 1003 Case Updates Car-Wizard Limited v Vixen Surface Treatments Limited [2026] EWHC 685 (Ch) by Sean Mosby Summary The claimant asserted misrepresentation and breach of a collateral contract by the defendant in respect of the supply of a vertical diamond cutting lathe for the claimant’s car wheel repair business. The judge found that the accountancy reports were not expert evidence but simply aids to understanding the details in a complex case. Learning points Simply applying arithmetic rules to data supplied to you, is not expert opinion. Experts must clearly distinguish between any factual evidence they are giving and their opinion as an expert. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags 07. Receiving Instructions16. Criticism and ComplaintsAccountancy11. Report Writing15. Giving Oral Evidence Related articles Nord Stream AG v Lloyd's Insurance Company SA & Anor Neutral Citation Number[2026] EWHC 1685 (Comm) Working with Expert Witnesses: Single Joint Experts X and Y (Care Proceedings: Publication of Judgment: Criticism of Expert Witness), Re Expert Witnesses at a Turning Point Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026 Comments are only visible to subscribers.