EWI partnership with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme EWI partnership with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme

EWI partnership with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme

The Expert Witness Institute has set up a new partnership with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme which is a collaborative initiative between the...
RICS consultation on Professional Standard for Surveyors acting as Expert Witnesses - 5th... RICS consultation on Professional Standard for Surveyors acting as Expert Witnesses - 5th...

RICS consultation on Professional Standard for Surveyors acting as Expert Witnesses - 5th...

The RICS is seeking feedback from public stakeholders on the updating of its Professional Standard for Surveyors Acting as Expert Witnesses. The...
Investigating possible non-accidental injuries in children Investigating possible non-accidental injuries in children

Investigating possible non-accidental injuries in children

In this case of suspected non-accidental injuries to an infant, only one of the experts was required to give evidence. This was Professor Fleming and...
The Expert Witness Institute and Expert Insight Announce Strategic Partnership to Elevate... The Expert Witness Institute and Expert Insight Announce Strategic Partnership to Elevate...

The Expert Witness Institute and Expert Insight Announce Strategic Partnership to Elevate...

The Expert Witness Institute, the UK’s leading body for expert witnesses, is proud to announce a new partnership with Expert Insight, a...
DHV (A Protected Party through his Litigation Friend WTX) v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2025]... DHV (A Protected Party through his Litigation Friend WTX) v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2025]...

DHV (A Protected Party through his Litigation Friend WTX) v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2025]...

The Claimant brought a claim for compensation in the UK after he was hit by an uninsured driver while on holiday in Mallorca and suffered major...
Loose talk, snide remarks and the expertise of general practitioners Loose talk, snide remarks and the expertise of general practitioners

Loose talk, snide remarks and the expertise of general practitioners

This is an important case for three reasons. First, it found that a general practitioner, giving evidence about the depressive disorder diagnosed...
Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness... Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

In the 15th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Membership Manager, Will Watkis, discuss the power of EWI membership and the...
A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

Marisa Shek is a Healthcare Architect and owner of Shek Architects. As an Expert Witness, she specialises in the field of accommodation for disabled...
Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025 Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

In the 14th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Marketing and Events Manger, Heather George, reflect on their highlights from...
A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

Susan Jones, founder of SJ Consultancy, has been a town planning consultant for over 40 years. As an Expert Witness, she provides evidence at public...
Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

In the 13th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at five long-standing policy issues that have had significant developments recently: (1)...
A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

Dr. Rohit Seth is trained in Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hair Transplant Surgery with over 20 years of surgical experience. A practicing...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

The importance of knowing, and complying with, the rules relating to the presentation of expert evidence
Wiebke Morgan 2220

The importance of knowing, and complying with, the rules relating to the presentation of expert evidence

byWiebke Morgan

A family court case considering various applications relating to residence and travel of a teenage girl.  For one of the issues (the risk of the girl entering a forced marriage). an application for a “full psychological assessment” of the family was made.  An expert was instructed, Dr X (the names are anonymised). However, Dr X was an eminent academic psychologist and not a clinical psychologist. Further the report did not comply with the relevant rules or Practice Directions.

In relation to expert evidence the judge clearly acknowledged the expert’s expertise and also made clear that they acted in good faith in carrying out their assessment and in giving evidence. However:

 

“In oral evidence Dr X confirmed that they had only completed ‘four or five’ reports for the Family Court and they were not familiar with the provisions of the Practice Direction. This latter confirmation is unacceptable. It is a core duty of any expert instructed in proceedings of this sort to read instructions, to read all documents and to be familiar with the applicable rules and practice directions. I am satisfied from considering the letter of instruction that these were sent to Dr X and that Dr X was directed to them at the outset of their instruction (although it would have been better if the letter had been more specific rather than incorporating by reference to an annex). In my view, the absence of a correct declaration should have been a red flag to the lawyers in the case which should have prompted query or further scrutiny. The court is entitled to expect that experts will read their instructions properly and be familiar with the basic expectations that the family court has of experts working in this field.”

 

“Although in the end, I have been able to make use of Dr X’s expertise and to reach sound decisions in this case, in another case the collective failure to identify what the report did not provide could have led to poor decision making or further delay in reaching a decision – because Dr X’s expertise was not a good match for all of the wide-ranging questions posed.”

 

The full judgement is very clear and detailed in clarifying the uncomfortable situation the judge was put in. The following quotes are just a few highlights and make sober reading. We strongly recommend reading the parts on expert evidence of the judgement in full (link below).


“Pursuant to para 4.1 of PD25B it is the duty of an expert in children proceedings (amongst other things):

  1. to comply with the Standards for Expert Witnesses in Children Proceedings in the Family Court which are set out in the Annex to this Practice Direction
  2. to answer the questions about which the expert is required to give an opinion
  3. to confine the opinion to matters material to the issues in the case and in relation only to the questions that are within the expert’s expertise (skill and experience);
  4.  where a question has been put which falls outside the expert’s expertise, to state this at the earliest opportunity and to volunteer an opinion as to whether another expert is required to bring expertise not possessed by those already involved.

Those matters should have been at the forefront of the minds of those instructing and the expert.

By paragraph 9.1 of PD25B the expert’s report in children proceedings must contain (amongst other things):

a statement (verified by a statement of truth) confirming that the expert is aware of the requirements of FPR Part 25 and this practice direction; and that

ii) they have complied with the Standards for Expert Witnesses in Children Proceedings in the Family Court which are set out in the Annex to Practice Direction 25B.

No such statement was contained in the report. Instead there was a statement of truth in entirely different terms which referred to an unidentified tribunal.”

 

“Regrettably, it was left to the court to explore the apparent non-compliance with PD25B. Undoubtedly this was not a comfortable experience for Dr X, but I strove to be fair with Dr X in trying to clarify the position.”

 

"Following the conclusion of her evidence Dr X sent a letter to the court. In that letter Dr X expressed that they wished to confirm their ‘credentials as a legitimate expert witness in this case’. As I was at pains to make clear to Dr X during their evidence, Dr X’s expertise in relation to honour based violence and forced marriage was plain. It is also clear that, as a Chartered Psychologist, the court was fully entitled to appoint Dr X as an expert on matters within their expertise. What is less clear is whether, when making the decision to instruct, it was appreciated that Dr X was not a practitioner psychologist. Dr X refers me to the guidance from the ACPUK states that ‘an academic psychologist may be useful to the court to consider specific matters within their area of research expertise’. The quoted guidance goes on to say that academic psychologists ‘should not be used to assess individuals, make diagnoses or formulations, or be asked to give recommendations about therapy’. And yet Dr X was instructed to do just that, and accepted those instructions."

 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.