22 April 2025 Keith Rix 802 Case Updates Not a bridge too far – dental negligence byKeith Rix Commentary The detail of this case is of relevance to dental experts and attention is drawn to the clarity and particularity with which Professor Harding set out the instances of treatment of the Claimant which was below the standard she could reasonably have expected and then identified the consequences thereof. There is a gastroenterological and pharmacological dimension to the case because it was alleged, and found, that the pain resulting from the negligent dental treatment necessitated treatment with NAISDs which caused ischaemic colitis. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags CausationDentistryConsent11. Report Writing10. Records Assessments and Site VisitsBridgeImplantIschaemic ColitisNSAID Related articles Most unsatisfactory expert paediatric evidence Email chains, gross misconduct and the experts who count the cost Should a solicitor use track changes on my expert report An expert report that is entirely equivocal on the key issues is of little assistance to the court The diagnosis hang-up and cardiological manifestations of PTSD Comments are only visible to subscribers.