15 September 2025 Sean Mosby 57 Case Updates Losing a professional membership that underpins your credibility bySean Mosby Summary The claimant brought an action against two of its founding shareholders, and companies owned or controlled by them, seeking compensation for harm caused by their alleged participation in a fraudulent scheme. The forensic accounting expert for the first defendant failed to inform the court, until shortly before he gave evidence, that he had ceased to hold a key professional membership. Learning points for experts You should inform the parties and the court if, after your expert report is filed, you cease to be the member of a professional organisation which is relevant to the expert evidence you have provided. Always consider whether you should inform your instructing party following any material change in your qualifications or accreditations. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags Professional membership16. Criticism and Complaints19. Approaching Retirement17. Maintaining your professional edgeCVForensic Accounting Related articles Ceto Shipping Corporation v Savory Shipping Inc [2025] EWHC 2033 (Comm) Andrew Lunt v BAC Impalloy Ltd [2025] EWCC 4 Investigating possible non-accidental injuries in children DHV (A Protected Party through his Litigation Friend WTX) v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2025] EWHC 2002 (KB) Ms Julia Tosh v Mr Vivek Gupta [2025] EWHC 2025 (KB) Comments are only visible to subscribers.