This was a significant and well reported patent case which was determined in the Intellectual Property List within the High Court last autumn.
The technical aspects of the case required significant expert input from the panel involved. The cross-examinations performed by leading Counsel for the parties were lengthy and complicated. This led to confusion over what evidence was given when the transcripts were re-visited on subsequent trial days. The case shows how consideration should be given to experts who are being cross-examined so not to overload them with questions and information on the stand.