Login Join Us

England and Wales

Civil Law

Please note that these are in the process of being transferred onto the gov.uk website. Though they can still be accessed on the Judiciary website. Both links are provided below.

Civil Procedure Rules

Rules and Directions

Civil Procedure Rules (Part 35)

As we have been highlighting to members, important changes to the length of expert reports will be coming into force from the 1st October 2023 for cases being dealt with through the newly created intermediate track which will be used to handle most civil claims in England and Wales worth between £25,000 and £100,000.

We have raised our concerns to the Civil Procedure Rules Committee, particularly around the lack of clarity as to what must be counted within the 20 pages.

Whilst no specific changes to have been made to Part 35, there has been a revision to Rule 28.

Under 28.14 (3) it states that unless the court orders otherwise:

"any expert report shall not exceed 20 pages, excluding any necessary photographs, plans and academic or technical articles attached to the report."

Therefore, from the 1st October 2023, experts will need to make sure that they comply with this rule if the case is being dealt with through the new intermediate track.

We are providing guidance for members here.

Guidance for the Instruction of Experts in Civil Claims

Civil Justice Reforms

Commercial Courts Guide 2022

 

Criminal Law 

Criminal Procedure Rules

Criminal Procedure Rules (Part 19)

Criminal Practice Directions

A guide to the criminal procedure rules 2020  and Criminal Practice Directions 2023

 

Family Law 

Family Procedure Rules (Part 25)

Part 25 - Experts and Assessors (applicable to applications issued by the court on or after 6 April 2022)     
Part 25 - Experts and Assessors (applicable to applications issued by the court before 6 April 2022)     
Practice Direction 25A - Experts and Assessors in Family Proceedings     
Practice Direction 25B - The Duties of an Expert, the Expert's Report and Arrangements for an Expert to Attend Court     
Practice Direction 25C - Children Proceedings - the Use of Single Joint Experts and the Process Leading to an Expert Being Instructed or Expert Evidence Being Put Before the Court     
Practice Direction 25D - Financial Remedy Proceedings and Other Family Proceedings (Except Children Proceedings) - the Use of Single Joint Experts and the Process Leading to Expert Evidence Being Put Before the Court     
Practice Direction 25E - Discussions Between Experts in Family Proceedings     
Practice Direction 25F - Assessors in Family Proceedings     
Practice Direction 25G – Toxicology test evidence

Civil news: new standards for experts in family cases involving children (from 10.10.14)

Family Justice Council Guidance for Experts

The President of the Family Division has published a Memorandum on Experts in the Family Court ( https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/PFD-Memo-Experts.pdf ) which emphasises the basis of the instruction of experts in particular (but not limited to ) in the field of parental alienation and reiterates the need for compliance with the Annex to Family Procedure Rules Practice Direction 25B.

 

Court of Protection

Court of Protection Rules 2017 (Experts - Part 15)

Practice Directions (Expert Evidence - 15A)

 

Tribunal Documents 

Statutory Instrument - The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013

Extract from the Statutory Instrument - section relating to expert evidence at tribunals

Judiciary.gov - Tribunals

Public and Commercial Services Union

The Law Donut - resources for your business

CIArb - Practice Guideline 10: Guidelines on the use of Tribunal-Appointed Experts, Legal Advisers and Assessors

Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) Rules in effect from 21 July 2020

Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) Practice Directions 2020
 

Legal Tests

Clinical Negligence - Differences between Hunter v Handley and Bolam 

 

Medical Information - Revalidation with the GMC 

FAQs

Help for doctors without a designated body

Licensed doctors with a designated body- your revalidation 

Responsible officers and employers

 

Related events:

Related news:

2023 in Review: Don’t let complacency ruin your credibility

2023 in Review: Don’t let complacency ruin your credibility

EWI Chief Executive Officer, Simon Berney-Edwards, shares his thoughts on 2023, a year where Expert Witnesses have continued to come under increasing scrutiny.

 

As we come to the end of the year, I’m taking the opportunity to reflect on yet another interesting year for Expert Witnesses. Once again, there have been several high-profile cases which have reflected the best and worst in Expert Evidence. So here are my top ten takeaways from 2023.

 

1. Don’t get complacent

You may have many years of experience as an Expert Witness, but even the most experienced experts can get things wrong. Over the last year we have seen:

  • Numerous reports submitted for assessment which have contained the wrong declarations and/or statement of truth.
  • Examples of experts who were coerced by the legal team to do something that they felt wasn’t right, only to have this backfire in court.
  • Examples of experts facing criticism in the witness box because they hadn’t addressed all the issues, evidence, or range of opinion.

 

So…….

 

 

2. Make sure you are up to date

Whilst the EWI will always cover key rule and regulation changes in our monthly newsletter, we have now started emailing members directly when key practice changes happen, or important guidance is issued.

 

However, why not take some time now to review your templates to make sure are using the correct declarations and statements of truth.

 

We’ve also created a Report Checklist you can use to ensure every report is compliant and of good quality.

 

 

3. Ensure you make yourself aware of some of the recent changes

On that note, you are hopefully fully aware of the recent changes that came into force at the beginning of October.

 

 

If you are not aware and you do work in these courts – it is important you familiarise yourself with these changes now.

 

 

4. Preparation is key to avoiding criticism

At this year’s Sir Michael Davies Lecture, the Honourable Mr Justice Williams, High Court judge and chair of The Family Justice Council Subcommittee on Experts, shared his views on the criticism of Experts in the courts.

 

His top tips to avoid it included:

 

  • Remember the fundamentals of being an expert.
  • Remain within your area of expertise.
  • Comply with the relevant procedural codes.
  • Don’t take on too much.
  • Comply with timetables.
  • Communicate any difficulties.

 

If you would like to hear more of what he had to say, you can access the recording.

 

 

5. Remain within your area of expertise

The judgment of Mrs Justice Bacon in Sycurio Ltd v PCI-Pal PLC & Anor [2023] EWHC 2161 (Pat) contains an important reminder for experts. During the course of the trial, it transpired that one of the expert witnesses (whose qualifications in their own field were not in doubt) had written a report and gave evidence on matters that were clearly outside their field of expertise. The result was that the judge was unable to accept their evidence on any matter that fell outside their core area of expertise.I am looking forward to hearing Mrs Justice Bacon’s views on this case at our Conference next year!

 

 

6. Review your opinion when necessary

If another Expert (whose opinion you rely on) changes their opinion, make sure you consider the implications for your opinion. A good example of this can be found in Benjamin Scarcliffe v Brampton Valley Group Ltd [2023] EWHC 1565(KB) which provides important lessons to be learned for all Expert Witnesses.

 

 

7. Take a moment to review your CV

Back in April, I reviewed the case of Watts v Watts [2023] EWHC 679 (Ch). This contains several learning points for experts. But one of the key issues affecting the credibility of the expert was that they had written nothing within their CV to demonstrate that they possessed the specific expertise relevant to the case.

 

Remember your CV needs to reflect why you can act as an expert in the case at hand.

 

Need some help? Why not attend our CV writing for Expert Witnesses webinar on the 24th January.

 

 

8. Consider how you might deal with dishonesty

The case of Muyepa v MOD highlighted the issues faced by Experts when dealing with fundamental dishonesty. Back in January, David Stothard, Managing Director at MAPS Medical, examined that case which was ultimately dismissed as a result of the claimant’s dishonesty.

 

He concluded by inviting experts to spend some time considering the evidence presented by the medical experts in this case set out in the judgment (paragraphs 167 to 278 inclusive), whether they fall within your area of expertise or not and reflect on how you might have presented your evidence had you been involved in the case.

 

 

9. Maintain your independence in discussions of Experts

There has been continued discussion during the year of the importance of remaining completely independent during meetings between Experts and ensuring experts do not involve their legal teams in the drafting of the joint statement or act on behalf of the legal team during the discussion. This was further clarified by new guidance from the King’s Bench division that clearly states this.

 

 

10. Maintain your credibility

Hopefully this will be clear by this point in this article, but some of the most easily rectifiable mistakes will seriously affect your credibility. So, as it is the end of the year, why not take some time to reflect on your practice and think about what you can do to ensure you retain your credibility in 2024.

 

 

And with that I wish you every success for the New Year.

Previous Article Expert Evidence and the Intermediate Track
Print
1108
Please login or register to post comments.