Expert Matters - The Podcast

Each month, CEO of EWI, Simon Berney-Edwards, and Policy Manger, Sean Mosby, will take an informed look at developments in the world of expert witnesses and expert evidence. There will also be updates on what's happening at EWI, as well as longer form content including interviews and in-depth discussion of key issues for the expert witness community.

 

Clicking on one of the topics below will display episodes with content relevant to that topic.

 

Did you know you can get CPD hours for listening to our Podcast?

Anyone who is a registered user on our website can record their time listening to the Podcast in their CPD Log by visiting their My EWI.

Record my CPD

Andrew Cannestra v Mclaren Automotive Events Limited [2025] EWHC 1844 (KB)
Case Updates

Andrew Cannestra v Mclaren Automotive Events Limited [2025] EWHC 1844 (KB)

The judge found that the Defendant’s expert in snowmobile operations was a partial witness who acted as an advocate for the Defendant’s case. He not only ignored the Claimant’s evidence and adopted the snowmobile guides’ evidence, but positively sought to persuade the Court to find facts in the Defendant’s favour.

 

Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025
Podcast

Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

In the 14th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Marketing and Events Manger, Heather George, reflect on their highlights from EWI's 2025 Annual Conference which was held on 20 June. The Conference featured a great line-up of panels and speakers, with keynote speeches from Lady Rose, Justice of the Supreme Court, and Lord Justice Birrs, the Deputy Head of Civil Justice. A wide range of lawyers, judges and expert witnesses joined the panel sessions, and EWI member Dr Richard Marshall provided an insightful session on AI and the Expert Witness. You can also check out our 'What's going on at EWI' and 'Newsreel' segments to keep up-to-date on the latest developments in the world of expert witnesses and expert evidence. 

Expert suggests Google would probably give the court a better answer than him
Case Updates

Expert suggests Google would probably give the court a better answer than him

The claimant alleged both negligence and breach of contract by the defendant designer of a container park near Felixstowe Port. The judge set out the reasons why she was not impressed by the claimant’s expert and treated his evidence with significant caution.

MJS Projects (March) Limited v RPS Consulting Services Limited [2025] EWHC 831 (TCC)

A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness
Day in the life

A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

Dr. Rohit Seth is trained in Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hair Transplant Surgery with over 20 years of surgical experience. A practicing clinician and Expert Witness, he shares how he balances a busy private surgical career with expert reporting and what makes this work both intellectually rigorous and professionally rewarding.

Philipa Hodgson v Dr Daniel Hammond & Anor [2025] EWHC 1261 (KB)
Case Updates

Philipa Hodgson v Dr Daniel Hammond & Anor [2025] EWHC 1261 (KB)

The claimant brought a clinical negligence claim against two general practitioners alleging that they failed to act on a potential diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease. The judge found that one of the GP experts had trespassed on the judicial function to determine the facts and had sought to advocate on behalf of the second defendant.

Unresponsive episodes in a child and the role of chloral hydrate
Case Updates

Unresponsive episodes in a child and the role of chloral hydrate

For the specialists this case illustrates how the court investigates case of perplexing presentations in children and the importance of considering as many as possible explanations. This was a case where the medical history was complex and where the material events occurred over a 5 months’ admission, so the volume of medical records must have been immense. The court was obviously greatly assisted by the expert factual evidence of one of the child’s consultants, specifically his summary of the child’s medical conditions and his table of medication. The weakness of one of the experts was that he had not sufficiently familiarised himself with the contents of the medical records and was not as familiar as with the chronology of the case as he might have been if he had created a chronology in his own investigation of the case.   

A Local Authority v Mother [2024] EWHC 3511 (Fam)

123578910Last